...
首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology >Comparison Between Intravenous Patient Controlled Analgesia And Subcutaneous Morphine In Patients After Gastrectomy
【24h】

Comparison Between Intravenous Patient Controlled Analgesia And Subcutaneous Morphine In Patients After Gastrectomy

机译:胃切除术后患者静脉自控镇痛与皮下吗啡的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

The Aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness on postoperative pain, by intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) using morphine compared with subcutaneous (s.c.) injections of morphine on demand in patients undergoing gastrectomy, so that subcutaneous morphine if found to have comparable efficacy and safety could be used in the setting of developing nations with less manpower and insufficient monitoring equipments. Fifty patients of either sex weighing b/w (56-80) kg & age b/w (60- 80) were randomly assigned to two different postoperative analgesic techniques for 24 hrs: i.v. PCA morphine (dose, 1 mg; lockout interval, 10 min; PCA group) or regular s.c. morphine injections (SC group) on demand. Postoperative pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS).Side-effects were also recorded systematically during the first 24 h after surgery The PCA group showed lower pain scores than the SC group. However the clinical significance of pain scores was weak. The incidence of side effects was similar in both the group We conclude that in healthy subjects with ASA I and ASA II status for gastrectomy, the postoperative pain can be managed effectively and safely using subcutaneous route for administration of morphine. This is true especially in a set up where level of nursing care is limited and high dependency units are not available to monitor patients with epidural or intravenous opioids. Abbreviations : PCA (patient controlled analgesia), s.c (subcutaneous), i.m (intramuscular), PACU (postanaesthesia care unit), Introduction Postoperative pain is one of the most feared and probably the most prevalent of all pain conditions, yet in many cases it continues to be inadequately treated. Physicians, nurses, and patients alike fear opioids, even though they remain the mainstay of acute pain treatment1. Furthermore, because of the acute and finite nature of postoperative pain, a degree of complacency in treating it sometimes prevails. In 1990, The Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) report ‘pain after surgery’ found 30–70% patients with moderate or worse pain after surgery. A recent review finds that although the incidence of post-operative pain has reduced by ≈2%/year for the last 30 years, 30% of patients still complain of moderate pain and 11% severe pain 2. Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) has emerged as a standard technique for management of acute postoperative pain1. In addition to being an efficacious analgesia, several advantages such as high patient acceptability, faster postoperative recovery, earlier hospital discharge and reduced nursing time have been ascribed to PCA (reviewed by Macintyre3). However, some of the more recent studies comparing the efficacy of PCA with that of conventional methods of opioid analgesia have produced conflicting results.4, 5 Choiniere and colleagues4 have demonstrated that PCA is more expensive and does not offer clinical advantages over regular i.m. dosing for pain management after hysterectomy. We performed a prospective randomized study in patients undergoing gastrectomy, to evaluate the effectiveness on postoperative pain, by intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) using morphine compared with subcutaneous (s.c.) injections of morphine on demand in patients undergoing gastrectomy, so that subcutaneous morphine if found to have comparable efficacy and safety could be used in the setting of developing nations with less manpower and insufficient monitoring equipments. Methods After informed consent a total 0f 50 patients of either sex weighing between 56-80 kg and age between 60- 80 years belonging to ASA-I and ASA-II presenting for elective gastrectomy were included in the study. Patients with history of moderate to severe vomiting in previous operation as a result of opioid use and Patients with developmental disability or cognitive impairment which limit understanding of PCA therapy or limits successful interface with the pump were excluded from the study.Patients were
机译:这项研究的目的是评估在胃切除术患者中通过使用吗啡的静脉内患者自控镇痛(PCA)与按需皮下注射吗啡的比较,以评估患者术后疼痛的效果,从而发现皮下吗啡具有可比性效力和安全性可用于人力资源较少,监测设备不足的发展中国家。五十名体重(b / w(56-80)kg和年龄b / w(60-80))的患者被随机分配到两种不同的术后镇痛技术中,持续24小时: PCA吗啡(剂量1毫克;停药间隔10分钟; PCA组)或常规s.c.吗啡注射液(SC组)按需提供。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估术后疼痛。在手术后的前24小时内还系统记录了副作用.PCA组的疼痛评分低于SC组。但是,疼痛评分的临床意义较弱。两组中的副作用发生率相似。我们得出结论,对于具有胃切除术的ASA I和ASA II状态的健康受试者,可以通过皮下途径施用吗啡有效而安全地管理术后疼痛。尤其是在护理水平有限且没有高依赖性单位来监测硬膜外或静脉阿片类药物患者的医院中,这是正确的。缩写:PCA(患者自控镇痛),sc(皮下),im(肌内),PACU(麻醉后护理单位),简介术后疼痛是所有疼痛状况中最令人担忧且可能最普遍的一种,但在许多情况下,它是仍然没有得到充分的对待。尽管阿片类药物仍然是急性疼痛治疗的中流1柱,但内科医生,护士和患者都对阿片类药物感到恐惧1。此外,由于术后疼痛的急性和有限的性质,有时会在治疗上感到自满。 1990年,英国皇家外科医学院(RCS)报告“手术后疼痛”发现30-70%的患者术后出现中度或重度疼痛。最近的一项研究发现,尽管在过去30年中,术后疼痛的发生率每年降低≈2%/年,但仍有30%的患者抱怨中度疼痛,而11%的患者则感到剧烈疼痛2。患者自控镇痛(PCA)已经成为治疗急性术后疼痛的标准技术1。 PCA不仅具有有效的镇痛作用,而且还具有许多优势,例如患者可接受性高,术后恢复快,出院早和护理时间短(Macintyre3对此进行了综述)。但是,最近进行的一些比较PCA与传统阿片类镇痛方法疗效的研究得出了相互矛盾的结果。4、5 Choiniere及其同事4证明,PCA更昂贵,并且没有常规i.m的临床优势。子宫切除术后疼痛处理的剂量。我们对接受胃切除术的患者进行了一项前瞻性随机研究,以评估使用吗啡的静脉内患者自控镇痛(PCA)与经胃切除术的患者皮下(sc)注射吗啡的比较,以评估术后疼痛的有效性,从而使皮下吗啡如果发现具有相当的功效和安全性,则可用于人力资源较少且监测设备不足的发展中国家。方法在知情同意后,共有ASAⅠ和ASAⅡ的0f 50年龄在56-80 kg且年龄在60-80岁之间的患者参加了选择性胃切除术。该研究排除了因使用阿片类药物而在先前手术中有中度至重度呕吐病史的患者以及发育障碍或认知障碍的患者,这些患者限制了对PCA治疗的理解或限制了与泵的成功连接。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号