首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Cardiovascular Research >Unplanned Readmissions after Hospital Discharge among Heart Failure Patients At Risk for 30-Day Readmission Using an Administrative Dataset and “Off the Shelf” Readmission Models
【24h】

Unplanned Readmissions after Hospital Discharge among Heart Failure Patients At Risk for 30-Day Readmission Using an Administrative Dataset and “Off the Shelf” Readmission Models

机译:使用管理数据集和“现成”的再入院模型,有心衰患者的30天再入院风险中的出院后计划外入院

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Readmission of patients who were recently discharged after hospitalization with heart failure (HF) represents an important, expensive, and often preventable adverse outcome. The risk of readmission may be modified by the quality and type of care provided to these patients. Improving readmission rates is the joint responsibility of hospitals and clinicians. Measuring readmission will create incentives to invest in interventions to improve hospital care, better assess the readiness of patients for discharge and facilitate transitions to outpatient status. This measure is also responsive to the recent call by Medicare Payment Advisory Commission to develop readmission measures, with HF as a priority condition.Objective: Unplanned hospital readmission has emerged as a major CMS focus of quality improvement and payment reform. Coupled with national initiatives, Adventist Health West chose unplanned readmissions following an index hospitalization for HF for a major system-wide initiative for CY 2013.Methods: Given competitive heart failure readmission models, our strategy became one of using the best of three – LACE, Hansan and PARR – as the basic building blocks to find a better predictive readmissions model.Results: The ROC curve and C-statistics for the five models using the combined data from Adventist Hospitals were computed for the combined hospitals and individually for each entity. Overall, the Hasan, PARR, and AH Models (C-statistics of 0.802, 0.821 and 0.846, respectively) were superior to either the CMS or LACE prediction model (C-statistic of 0.749 and 0.547, respectively).Conclusion: Using “Off the Shelf” readmission HF models as a guide, a useful readmission model may be derived which, in this case, is slightly superior than competing readmission models. Introduction Unplanned hospital readmissions within 30 days of a prior hospitalization for heart failure (HF) are common, expensive and often preventable. These unplanned readmissions are recognized as a marker of hospital-level quality and efficiency of care and a significant contributor to rising healthcare costs. Since Heart failure is the leading cause of hospitalization among patients over the age of 65 years, the magnitude of unplanned readmissions within 30 days is enormous. Nearly one fifth of Medicare fee-for-service enrollees discharged from acute care hospitals are readmitted within 30 days, incurring additional costs of US$17.4 billion dollars annually (1). While it is unclear whether such readmissions are entirely preventable, there is evidence that targeted interventions initiated before and/or shortly after discharge can decrease the likelihood of readmission by 25% to 45% (2-7). Readmission rates are influenced by the quality of inpatient and outpatient care, availability and use of effective disease management programs, and the bed capacity of the local health care system. Some of the variation in readmissions may be attributable to delivery system characteristics (8). Also, interventions during and after a hospitalization can be effective in reducing readmission rates in geriatric populations (3, 6) and for elderly HF patients (2, 4, 9-12) Tracking readmissions also emphasizes improvement in care transitions and care coordination. Although discharge planning is required by Medicare as a condition of participation for hospitals, transitional care focuses more broadly on “hands-off” of care from one setting to another, and may have implications for quality and costs (Coleman, 2005). Despite positive results in disease management studies, many post-hospital HF management programs have been discontinued, most often due to financial considerations (13).Readmission of patients who were recently discharged after hospitalization with HF represents an important, expensive, and often preventable adverse outcome. The risk of readmission can certainly be modified by the quality and type of care provided to these patients. Improving readmission rates i
机译:背景:近期因心力衰竭(HF)住院出院的患者再次入院是一项重要,昂贵且通常可以预防的不良后果。再入院的风险可以通过为这些患者提供的护理质量和类型来改变。提高再入院率是医院和临床医生的共同责任。衡量再入院率将激励人们投资于干预措施,以改善医院护理,更好地评估患者出院的准备情况并促进向门诊病人的过渡。这项措施还响应了Medicare付款咨询委员会最近提出的以HF为优先条件制定再入院措施的目标。目的:计划外的医院再入院已成为CMS质量改善和付款改革的主要重点。再加上国家倡议,Adventist Health West在HF指数住院治疗后选择了计划外的再次入院,这是CY 2013年度一项重大的全系统倡议。 Hansan和PARR –是找到更好的预测再入院模型的基本要素。结果:使用来自复临医院的合并数据,对合并医院和每个实体分别计算了五个模型的ROC曲线和C统计量。总体而言,Hasan,PARR和AH模型(C统计量分别为0.802、0.821和0.846)优于CMS或LACE预测模型(C统计量分别为0.749和0.547)。结论:使用“关”以“架式”再入院HF模型为指南,可以得出有用的再入院模型,在这种情况下,该模型比竞争性再入院模型稍好。引言事先因心力衰竭(HF)住院的30天内计划外的住院再住院是常见,昂贵且通常可以预防的。这些计划外的再入院被认为是医院级医疗质量和服务效率的标志,并且是医疗保健成本上升的重要原因。由于心力衰竭是65岁以上患者住院的主要原因,因此30天内计划外的再次入院的数量巨大。从急诊医院出院的Medicare服务式参保人员中有近五分之一在30天内被重新接纳,每年产生的额外费用为174亿美元(1)。虽然尚不清楚这种再入院是否完全可以预防,但有证据表明,出院前和/或出院后不久采取的有针对性的干预措施可以将再入院的可能性降低25%至45%(2-7)。再入院率受住院和门诊护理质量,有效疾病管理计划的可用性和使用以及当地卫生保健系统的床位容量的影响。再入的某些变化可能归因于输送系统的特性(8)。同样,住院期间和之后的干预措施可以有效降低老年病人群(3,6)和老年HF患者(2,4,9-12)的再入院率。追踪再入院也强调改善护理过渡和护理协调。尽管Medicare要求出院计划是医院参与的一个条件,但过渡护理更广泛地侧重于将护理从一种环境转移到另一种环境,这可能会影响质量和成本(Coleman,2005年)。尽管在疾病管理研究中取得了积极的成果,但许多医院后的HF管理计划仍被终止,主要是出于财务考虑(13).HF住院后刚出院的患者再次入院是一项重要的,昂贵的且通常可以预防的不良反应结果。当然,再入院的风险可以通过为这些患者提供的护理质量和类型来改变。提高入学率

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号