首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Cardiovascular Research >Stroke and ON-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Should We Change to OFF-Pump? Our Experience from the North of Jordan.
【24h】

Stroke and ON-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Should We Change to OFF-Pump? Our Experience from the North of Jordan.

机译:脑卒中和泵上冠状动脉旁路移植术。我们应该改为非泵吗?我们在约旦北部的经验。

获取原文
           

摘要

PRINCIPLES: Stroke is a well known complication after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). We were interested in reviewing our experience with on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, to evaluate its neurologic dysfunction and its impact on patient management. And to ask a question that recently applied. Should we change to OFF-Pump?MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 1.050 patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was performed from May 5, 2003, to December 31, 2007, in our institution. Stroke was defined as any new permanent global or focal neurological deficit, immediately after extubation (early) or within 5-6 day in the hospital (late). Medline literature was searched for all the studies published in the English language between 1999 and 2006 reporting neurological complications on patients undergoing CABG with emphasis on comparisons between off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (OPCAB) and CPB techniques. The following terms were used: Stroke and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting; on-pump versus off-pump; brain injury after coronary artery bypass grafting.RESULTS: Stroke occurred in 19 patients (1.81%). From this group thirteen were female (68.42%). Fifteen patients were diabetic (78.95%). History of previous transient ischemic attacks was found in 14 patients (73.68%). CONCLUSIONS: Female sex, diabetic patients and patients with previous transient ischemic attacks are associated with increased the risk of stroke and in-hospital mortality. Prospectively randomised trial is needed to give us a proper answer on our question. Introduction Coronary artery bypass grafting in the late 1960s was first performed without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) [1]. But after the use of CPB and cardioplegic arrest this technique was largely abandoned [2]. With the use of cardiopulmonary bypass neurologic dysfunction is well documented as an associated complication of cardiac surgery [3]. Cerebral injury occurs in two distinct forms, and become an important cause of morbidity and mortality after open heart surgery [4]. Stroke, as devastating complication occurs in 3% of patients undergoing CABG [5]. Soon after open heart surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), cognitive dysfunction, occurs in as many as 80% of patients and persists in one fourth of these patients six months after surgery and only by detailed neuropsychologic testing can be detected [4,6,7]. Many factors participate in the pathogenesis of cerebral injury and cognitive dysfunction after cardiac surgery, but there is increasing evidence that multiple microemboli arising from the ascending aorta, the heart chambers, or the bypass circuit are the primary pathophysiologic mechanisms producing diffuse ischemic cerebral injury [8]. Cardiopulmonary bypass requires cannulation and cross-clamping of the ascending aorta, which per se may dislodge atheromatous macroemboli, leading to stroke [9]. Cardiopulmonary bypass is a well known source that generates microemboli and increases the permeability of the blood-brain barrier which may adversely affect cognitive function [10,11]. Patients and Methods 1050 consecutive patients who were undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) from May 5, 2003, to December 31, 2007, were enrolled in this retrospective study. Our cardiac center is a new one in the north since May 5, 2002. All patients had undergone conventional CABG using a left internal mammary artery (LIMA) graft with different surgeons. Stroke was defined as any new permanent global or focal neurological deficit. Stroke was first detected by cardiac surgeon immediately after extubation (early) or within 5-6 day in the hospital (late), then neurologist will be consulted, and in the majority of patients they were confirmed by CT head scan. Patients having cardiac valve surgery, ASD (atrial septal defect) repair, LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction) <0.40, and undergoing repeat CAB
机译:原则:中风是使用心肺旁路(CPB)进行冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)后的一种众所周知的并发症。我们有兴趣回顾我们在泵上冠状动脉搭桥术中的经验,以评估其神经功能障碍及其对患者管理的影响。并提出一个最近应用的问题。材料和方法:2003年5月5日至2007年12月31日,我们对1.050例行择期冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)的患者进行了回顾性研究。中风定义为在拔管后立即(早期)或在医院5-6天之内(晚期)出现的任何新的永久性全局或局灶性神经功能缺损。在Medline文献中搜索了1999年至2006年间所有以英语发表的研究,这些研究报告了接受CABG的患者的神经系统并发症,重点是比较非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥手术(OPCAB)和CPB技术之间的比较。使用以下术语:中风和泵上冠状动脉搭桥术;上泵与非泵结果:19例患者发生中风(1.81%)。该组中有13位女性(68.42%)。糖尿病患者15例(78.95%)。在14名患者中发现了先前的短暂性脑缺血发作的历史(73.68%)。结论:女性,糖尿病患者和先前短暂性脑缺血发作的患者与中风和院内死亡的风险增加相关。需要进行前瞻性随机试验才能对我们的问题给出正确的答案。简介1960年代后期首次进行了冠状动脉搭桥术,而没有使用体外循环(CPB)[1]。但是在使用CPB和心脏停搏后,该技术在很大程度上被放弃了[2]。通过使用心肺旁路手术,神经功能障碍已被证明是心脏手术的相关并发症[3]。脑损伤以两种不同的形式发生,并成为心脏直视手术后发病和死亡的重要原因[4]。中风是毁灭性并发症,发生在3%的CABG患者中[5]。在使用心肺搭桥术(CPB)进行的心脏直视手术后不久,认知功能障碍就发生在多达80%的患者中,并在术后六个月内持续在这些患者中占四分之一,只有通过详细的神经心理学测试才能发现[4,6, 7]。许多因素参与心脏手术后脑损伤和认知功能障碍的发病机制,但是越来越多的证据表明,升主动脉,心腔或旁路引起的多个微栓子是造成弥漫性缺血性脑损伤的主要病理生理机制[8]。 ]。心肺旁路术需要插管和交叉夹住升主动脉,这本身可能使动脉粥样硬化性大栓塞移位,导致中风[9]。心肺旁路是产生微栓子并增加血脑屏障通透性的众所周知来源,这可能会对认知功能产生不利影响[10,11]。患者和方法自2003年5月5日至2007年12月31日,连续1050例接受冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的患者入选了这项回顾性研究。自2002年5月5日以来,我们的心脏中心是北部的一个新中心。所有患者均接受了左胸内动脉(LIMA)移植手术,并由不同的外科医生进行了常规CABG。中风定义为任何新的永久性全局或局灶性神经功能缺损。心脏外科医生首先在拔管后(早期)或在医院5-6天之内(晚期)首先由心脏外科医生检测到中风,然后将向神经科医生咨询,大多数患者已通过CT头颅扫描得到了证实。进行心脏瓣膜手术,ASD(房间隔缺损)修复,LVEF(左心室射血分数)<0.40并进行重复CAB的患者

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号