首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Nuclear Medicine >Gated Myocardial Perfusion SPECT In Australia
【24h】

Gated Myocardial Perfusion SPECT In Australia

机译:澳大利亚门控心肌灌注SPECT

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Despite guidelines provided by the SNM and the ASNC, there is no universally accepted consensus on acquisition and processing protocols for gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. Anecdotal evidence suggests there is significant variability in both acquisition and processing parameters throughout Australian departments.Methodology: This study was a self administered questionnaire of current acquisition and processing parameters utilised for gated myocardial perfusion SPECT across Australia. The sampling frame comprised 136 Nuclear Medicine departments across Australia including all departments accredited by the ANZSNM.Results: With respect to the guidelines for performing gated myocardial perfusion SPECT outlined by the ASNC, only 4.4% (4/90) of Australian departments comply with minimum standards. The magnitude of this result, in a large part, is due to the high proportion of departments that do not gate both the rest and stress studies (68.9%). Exclusion of this parameter still means that just 13.3% (12/90) of Australian departments comply with minimum standards. Conclusion: While the principle of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT is without debate there is a requirement for investigation and guidelines for optimisation of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT protocols. There is a need for further investigation of the actual impact of discordance with current guidelines on the diagnostic utility of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. Introduction Each year in Australia, approximately 55000 myocardial perfusions studies are performed (1) because it is the key non invasive procedure that is in widespread use for the investigation of known or suspected CAD. In recent years there have been numerous advances in the technology, science and methodology utilised in performing myocardial perfusion studies in Nuclear Medicine. The emergence of 99mTc based radiopharmaceuticals combined with advances in technology have been responsible for the transition from planar imaging, to single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and more recently to gated SPECT. For gated myocardial perfusion SPECT studies, imaging time is not increased (compared with ungated) and a traditional ungated image data set can be produced from the gated data set without compromising normal study quality. Processing time and memory required is, however, substantially increased (by a factor equal to the number of gate intervals) which means older computer systems may be inadequate for gated myocardial perfusion SPECT studies.Despite guidelines provided by the Society of Nuclear Medicine (SNM) (2) and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology (ASNC) (3), there is no universally accepted consensus on acquisition and processing protocols in gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. Anecdotal evidence suggests there is significant variability in both acquisition and processing parameters throughout Australian departments. This questionnaire aimed to outline current procedure and practice for gated myocardial perfusion SPECT in Australia and identify areas requiring further investigation. Methodology This study was a survey of current acquisition and processing parameters utilised for gated myocardial perfusion SPECT throughout Australia. The study design employed a self administered questionnaire, ensuring participant anonymity. The sampling frame included 136 Australian Nuclear Medicine departments. All departments accredited by the ANZSNM were included. A reply paid envelope was included for the return of the completed questionnaire. The statistical significance was calculated using Chi square analysis for nominal data and Student’s t test for continuous data. The F test analysis of variances was used to determine statistically significant differences within grouped data. A P value less than 0.05 was considered significant. The difference between independent means and proportions was calculated with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Results The collection period saw 75 of
机译:简介:尽管SNM和ASNC提供了指导原则,但关于门控心肌灌注SPECT的获取和处理协议尚无公认的共识。传闻证据表明,整个澳大利亚各科室的采集和处理参数均存在显着差异。方法:本研究是一项针对澳大利亚门控心肌灌注SPECT当前采集和处理参数的自我管理调查表。抽样框架包括澳大利亚136个核医学科室,包括ANZSNM认可的所有科室。结果:就ASNC概述的门控心肌灌注SPECT指导原则而言,只有4.4%(4/90)的澳大利亚科室符合最低要求标准。这一结果之所以如此之大,在很大程度上是由于没有同时进行其余研究和压力研究的部门比例很高(68.9%)。排除此参数仍然意味着仅13.3%(12/90)的澳大利亚部门符合最低标准。结论:虽然门控心肌灌注SPECT的原理是毋庸置疑的,但仍需要进行调查和优化门控心肌灌注SPECT方案的指南。有必要进一步研究与当前指南不一致对门控心肌灌注SPECT诊断实用性的实际影响。引言在澳大利亚,每年大约要进行55,000例心肌灌注研究(1),因为这是广泛用于研究已知或疑似CAD的关键非侵入性手术。近年来,在进行核医学中的心肌灌注研究中使用的技术,科学和方法学方面取得了许多进步。基于99mTc的放射性药物的出现与技术的进步相结合,导致了从平面成像,单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)以及最近到门控SPECT的过渡。对于门控心肌灌注SPECT研究,不增加成像时间(与非门控相比),可以从门控数据集生成传统的非门控图像数据集,而不会影响正常的研究质量。然而,所需的处理时间和内存大大增加(增加了等于门间隔的数量),这意味着较旧的计算机系统可能不足以进行门控心肌灌注SPECT研究。尽管有核医学协会(SNM)提供的指导原则(2)和美国核心脏病学会(ASNC)(3),关于门控心肌灌注SPECT的获取和处理方案尚无公认的共识。轶事证据表明,整个澳大利亚部门的采集和处理参数均存在很大差异。该问卷旨在概述澳大利亚门控心肌灌注SPECT的当前程序和实践,并确定需要进一步调查的领域。方法学本研究是对整个澳大利亚用于门控心肌灌注SPECT的当前采集和处理参数的调查。研究设计采用了自我管理的问卷,以确保参与者的匿名性。抽样框架包括136个澳大利亚核医学部门。包括了由ANZSNM认可的所有部门。附有回信已付信封,用于退回已填写的调查表。统计数据的显着性使用名义数据的卡方分析和连续数据的Student t检验计算。方差的F检验分析用于确定分组数据中的统计学显着性差异。 P值小于0.05被认为是显着的。独立平均值和比例之间的差异是使用95%置信区间(CI)计算的。结果收集期有75

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号