首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Pathology >Comparative Study of Human Papilloma Virus DNA Detection and Results of Histopathological Examination of Cervical Colposcopic Biopsy
【24h】

Comparative Study of Human Papilloma Virus DNA Detection and Results of Histopathological Examination of Cervical Colposcopic Biopsy

机译:人乳头瘤病毒DNA检测与宫颈阴道镜活检组织病理学检查结果的比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

In our study, we come to investigate the factors that may participate to false-negative colposcopic biopsy results. Patients positive for high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA with negative cervical histopathologic findings were examined between January 2004 and August 2006. Patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC) in Papanicolaou smears, with positive HPV DNA results, but negative cervical histopathologic findings accounted for 4.5% of all ASC smears submitted for HPV DNA testing. We found 4% of the cases had focal HPV infection or mild dysplasia. When serial sectioning of the biopsy material were examined, we found that 31% had clinically significant lesions: HPV infection or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 1, 19%; CIN 2/3, 8%; and dysplasia, not otherwise specified, 3%. Of the remaining patients, follow-up revealed squamous abnormalities in 25%. About 5% of patients with positive HPV DNA results had a negative follow-up biopsy result. "False-negative" biopsies accounted for one third of cases. Introduction Epidemiologic data have long implicated a sexually transmitted agent, based specifically on the risk factors for cervical cancer, which include early age at first intercourse, multiple sexual partners, and a male partner with multiple previous sexual partners. A recent survey of gynecologic cytology reporting practices found a median reporting rate of 3.9% for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC).[1] Although in most patients with ASC a significant lesion will not be found in subsequent examination, they require further evaluation because 5% to 10% of patients initially diagnosed with ASC actually have high-grade dysplasia.[2] Until recently, management of patients with ASC often involved colposcopic examination and cervical biopsy. [3]Human PapillomaVirus (HPV) is the known cause of the venereally transmitted vulvar condyloma accuminatum. It is also suspected to be an oncogenic agent in a variety of squamous tumors and proliferative lesions of skin and mucus membranes; however, there is mounting evidence for HPV involvement in cervical cancer. [4, 5] The strongest evidence is that HPV DNA is detected by hybridization techniques in 75 – 100% if patients with condylomas, precancerous cervical dysplasia, and invasive carcinoma. Since the mid to late 1990s, testing for HPV DNA in Pap tests has been shown to be a useful adjunct in triaging patients with ASC test results for colposcopy. It has been shown that HPV DNA testing using the Hybrid Capture II assay, or HCII (Digene, Beltsville, MD), performed better than repeated cytology in triaging patients with ASC.[4] In addition, reflex high-risk HPV DNA testing offers the same life expectancy while remaining more cost-effective than other management strategies.[5, 6]In a recent meta-analysis, it has been reported that in a small but significant number of women, no abnormalities were found by colposcopic-directed cervical biopsy after a diagnosis of ASC with positive high-risk HPV DNA testing.[4] In most cytologic-histologic correlation studies, colposcopic biopsy often is regarded as the “gold standard” on which gynecologic cytologic screening is to be judged. However, several studies have demonstrated that histologic examination is far from perfect.[7, 8] Aim of the workThe aim of this work is to try to investigate factors that may contribute to false-negative colposcopic biopsy results in positive high-risk HPV DNA results. Patients and Methods The material of this study included all recorded cases in the archive of the Medical Records Department of the Institute received in our lab from different Governorate areas and referred to Damanhour National Medical Institute Hospital (DNMI) during the period from January 2004 to August 2006.A computerized search identified patients with ASC Pap test results and positive results of reflexive high-risk HPV DNA testing during the period from January 2004 to August 2006. A
机译:在我们的研究中,我们来调查可能参与假阴性阴道镜活检结果的因素。在2004年1月至2006年8月之间检查了高危型人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)DNA阳性且宫颈组织病理学结果为阴性的患者。帕潘尼古拉涂片中具有不明重要性的非典型鳞状细胞(ASC)患者,HPV DNA结果为阳性,但宫颈阴性组织病理学发现占提交HPV DNA检测的所有ASC涂片的4.5%。我们发现4%的病例患有局灶性HPV感染或轻度不典型增生。在对活检材料进行连续切片检查时,我们发现31%的患者具有临床上明显的病变:HPV感染或宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)1、19%; CIN 2 / 3,8%;除非另有说明,否则不典型增生为3%。在其余患者中,随访发现有25%的鳞状异常。 HPV DNA结果阳性的患者中约有5%的活检结果为阴性。 “假阴性”活检占病例的三分之一。简介流行病学数据长期以来一直牵涉到性传播媒介,特别是基于子宫颈癌的危险因素,包括初次性交年龄早,多个性伴侣以及具有多个先前性伴侣的男性伴侣。最近对妇科细胞学报告方法的调查发现,具有非确定意义的非典型鳞状细胞(ASC)的中位报告率为3.9%。[1]尽管在大多数ASC患者中,在随后的检查中不会发现明显的病变,但仍需要进一步评估,因为最初诊断为ASC的患者中有5%至10%实际上患有严重的异型增生。[2]直到最近,对ASC患者的管理常常涉及阴道镜检查和宫颈活检。 [3]人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)是性传播性阴茎尖锐湿疣的已知病因。还被怀疑是多种鳞状肿瘤以及皮肤和粘膜增生性病变的致癌剂;但是,越来越多的证据表明HPV参与了子宫颈癌。 [4,5]最有力的证据是,如果患有con状瘤,癌前宫颈异型增生和浸润性癌,则可通过杂交技术检测到HPV DNA的比例为75 – 100%。从1990年代中期到后期,在宫颈涂片ASC测试结果中,在Pap测试中检测HPV DNA是对患者进行分类的有用辅助手段。研究表明,在进行ASC分诊的患者中,使用Hybrid Capture II检测法或HCII(Digene,贝尔茨维尔,马里兰州)进行的HPV DNA检测比重复细胞学检查的效果更好。[4]此外,反射性高风险HPV DNA测试可提供相同的预期寿命,同时仍比其他管理策略更具成本效益。[5,6]在最近的荟萃分析中,据报道,在少数但大量的女性,经高风险HPV DNA检测阳性诊断为ASC后,经阴道镜直接宫颈活检未发现异常。[4]在大多数细胞学-组织学相关性研究中,阴道镜活检通常被视为判断妇科细胞学筛查的“金标准”。但是,一些研究表明组织学检查还远远不够完善。[7,8]工作的目的这项工作的目的是试图研究可能导致高风险HPV DNA阳性假阴性阴道镜活检结果的因素。结果。患者和方法本研究的材料包括2004年1月至8月期间在我们实验室中从不同省份接收到的研究所病历部门档案中的所有记录病例,并转交给了达曼霍尔国家医学研究所医院(DNMI)。 2006年。通过计算机搜索确定了2004年1月至2006年8月期间ASC Pap检测结果和反射性高危HPV DNA检测阳性结果的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号