首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Pathology >Hemorrhagic Epithelioid Angiosarcoma of the Peritoneal Cavity Clinically Posing as a Dissecting Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm; A Case Report and Literature Review
【24h】

Hemorrhagic Epithelioid Angiosarcoma of the Peritoneal Cavity Clinically Posing as a Dissecting Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm; A Case Report and Literature Review

机译:腹膜腔出血性上皮样血管肉瘤临床上表现为解剖性腹主动脉瘤;病例报告及文献复习

获取原文
           

摘要

Epithelioid angiosarcoma (EA) is a very rare, malignant, vascular neoplasm that is difficult to diagnose and treat. To our knowledge involvement of the omentum and, or mesentery has been reported in only four other cases.1-4 Angiosarcomas comprise less than 2% of all sarcomas, and sarcomas comprise less than 1% of soft tissue cancers.5-8 Among angiosarcomas, the epithelioid variant is exceedingly rare.8,9 The differential diagnosis for abdominal pain is extensive and includes abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), mesenteric ischemia and infarction, peritonitis, and intestinal obstruction. Based on laboratory and imaging studies, inclusion of mesenteric angiosarcoma may be warranted in this list of differentials . Since these neoplasms are readily mistaken for carcinomas and melanomas, immunohistochemical staining is vital to diagnosing these lesions. The patient’s omentum and mesenteric lesions were positive with epithelial marker AE-1/AE-3; the vascular markers CD31, Factor VIII, and CD34; as well as endothelial marker Fli-1 supporting the diagnosis of epithelioid angiosarcoma. Interestingly, the human herpes virus stain was negative. This case demonstrates the importance of considering epithelioid angiosarcoma in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with progressively worsening abdominal pain and findings reminiscent of a rupured aortic aneurysm. Also challenging is the histopathologic diagnosis of these tumors due to the ‘‘epithelioid’’ features of the neoplastic endothelial cells. Utilizing appropriate immunohistochemical studies can be extremely helpful in this regard. Case Report A 77 year old, obese, Latino male presented to the emergency department (ED) with two weeks complaint of abdominal pain, which became progressively worse. The patient was nauseous, lethargic, had a decrease in appetite but denied any hematemesis and hemtochezia. Pertinent past medical history included ethanol abuse, hypertension and benign prostatic hypertrophy. Upon admission, he was hypotensive (102/70), tachycardic (110), with a respiration rate of 16 breaths per minute. He had a slightly distended, non-tender abdomen. A slight hernia was seen in the abdomen. The physical exam was otherwise normal. Initial laboratory studies revealed an anemia with hemoglobin of 8.2 g/dL and hematocrit of 24.4%. CT scan showed an abdominal aortic aneurysm 5.2 X 5.0 X 7.5 cm, without evidence of hematoma. There was also questionable free fluid in the abdomen which “appeared more dense than urine suggesting…blood” and diverticulosis. Based on these findings, the patient was admitted to the intensive care unit, transfused, and seen by various specialists. The vascular surgeon ruled out dissection of the aneurysm. An angiogram did not show active bleeding. Serial CT scans, with and without contrast, did not show leaking from the aortic aneurysm. The CT scans did show peritoneal fluid extending into the pelvis and around the liver. There was an infiltrative process involving the omental and mesenteric fat, deep to the rectus abdominus muscles, representing either blood or inflammation. Paracentesis was performed, showing blood.Approximately one week prior to presenting to the ED, the patient underwent an outside CT without contrast. The report stated that there wasno leakage from the aneurysm, no ascites nor pneumoperitoneum. Scans through the lower abdomen and upper pelvis showed irregular peritoneal densities within the anterior pelvic peritoneal fat. Multiple diverticulae were noted in the sigmoid colon located posterior and medial to the area of fatty infiltration. Findings were suggestive of diverticulitis vs other inflammatory processes. Neoplastic involvement of the peritoneum was also in the differential diagnosis. There was rapid progression of the disease. In less than one week the patient developed free fluid (blood) in his abdominal cavity.Following hospital admission, the patient underwent a laparotomy where approximately seven liters of blood
机译:上皮样血管肉瘤(EA)是一种非常罕见,恶性的血管肿瘤,难以诊断和治疗。据我们所知,仅在另外四例中报告了网膜和/或肠系膜受累。1-4血管肉瘤占所有肉瘤的不到2%,肉瘤占软组织癌的不到1%。5-8 8,9腹痛的鉴别诊断是广泛的,包括腹主动脉瘤(AAA),肠系膜缺血和梗塞,腹膜炎和肠梗阻。根据实验室和影像学研究,可能需要将肠系膜血管肉瘤包括在内。由于这些肿瘤容易被误认为是癌和黑色素瘤,因此免疫组织化学染色对诊断这些病变至关重要。上皮标记AE-1 / AE-3使患者的大网膜和肠系膜病变阳性;血管标记CD31,因子VIII和CD34;以及支持上皮样血管肉瘤诊断的内皮标记Fli-1。有趣的是,人类疱疹病毒染色呈阴性。该病例证明了在上腹性疼痛逐渐加重的患者的鉴别诊断中考虑上皮样血管肉瘤的重要性,并且使人联想到主动脉瘤破裂。由于肿瘤内皮细胞的“上皮样”特征,对这些肿瘤的组织病理学诊断也具有挑战性。在这方面,使用适当的免疫组化研究可能非常有帮助。病例报告一名77岁,肥胖,拉丁裔的男性因出现腹部疼痛两周而诉诸急诊科,病情逐渐加重。该患者恶心,嗜睡,食欲下降但否认有任何呕血和咯血。相关的既往病史包括乙醇滥用,高血压和良性前列腺肥大。入院后,他降压(102/70),心动过速(110),呼吸速率为每分钟16次呼吸。他的腹部有些膨胀,没有嫩。腹部可见轻度疝气。身体检查正常。最初的实验室研究显示,贫血的血红蛋白为8.2 g / dL,血细胞比容为24.4%。 CT扫描显示腹主动脉瘤5.2 X 5.0 X 7.5 cm,无血肿迹象。腹部还存在可疑的游离液,“看上去比尿液更稠,表明……有血”和憩室病。基于这些发现,患者被送入重症监护病房,进行了输血,并由各种专家进行了检查。血管外科医生排除了动脉瘤的夹层。血管造影未显示活动性出血。连续的CT扫描,无论有无对比,均未显示出主动脉瘤渗漏。 CT扫描确实显示腹膜液延伸到骨盆和肝脏周围。有一个渗透过程,涉及网膜和肠系膜脂肪,深至腹直肌肌肉,代表血液或炎症。进行穿刺穿刺术,显示出血液。在接受急诊就诊前大约一周,患者接受了外部CT检查,没有造影剂。该报告指出,动脉瘤无渗漏,无腹水或气腹。通过小腹和上骨盆的扫描显示前盆腔腹膜脂肪内的腹膜密度不规则。乙状结肠位于脂肪浸润区域的后方和内侧,发现有多个憩室。研究结果提示憩室炎与其他炎症过程的关系。肿瘤累及腹膜也参与了鉴别诊断。该病进展迅速。在不到一周的时间里,患者腹腔出现了积水(血液)。入院后,患者接受了剖腹手术,大约有7升血液

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号