...
首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery >Non-Operative Management Of Chest Tube Induced Pulmonary Artery Injury
【24h】

Non-Operative Management Of Chest Tube Induced Pulmonary Artery Injury

机译:胸管诱发的肺动脉损伤的非手术治疗

获取原文
           

摘要

Chest tube insertion (thoracostomy) is a common procedure performed in the emergency department, the operating theatre and the intensive care unit. Inserting a drain into the pulmonary artery is a rare but life threatening complication. We report a case of successful non-operative management of a pulmonary artery injury after tube thoracostomy insertion. Introduction Chest tube insertion (thoracostomy) is commonly used in the management of thoracic empyema or pneumothorax. Major thoracic vessel injuries are rare but have been reported in literature. We report a case of a pulmonary artery injury caused by chest tube insertion, which has been folded in the pulmonary artery and where the patient was not a candidate for a thoracotomy. We managed this case non-operatively and retracted the drain. Clinical details A 63-year-old female presented to the emergency department with septic shock and somnolence. Six months before, an adenocarcinoma of the upper right lobe had been diagnosed during workup for aortic valve stenosis en mitral valve insufficiency, for which she underwent right upper lobectomy (pT1N0M0 adenocarcinoma) followed by an aortic valve replacement (Edward Magna Fase) five months ago. The mitral valve repair was not feasible because of adhesions after the upper lobe lobectomy. The postoperative cardiac function was still severely impaired. Furthermore the patient had chronic post thrombotic syndrome with ulcers on both legs. The patient required intubation and intensive care unit admission. A chest X ray showed pleural effusion. On needle aspiration pus was drained. No CT or ultrasound was performed in advance of the procedure. A 16 Fr chest-tube was blunt inserted in the forth intercostal space at the place of the diagnostic puncture. Directly after insertion, 2000ml of blood was drained in the drainage system. The chest-tube was immediately clamped. The patient became hypotensive and resuscitation was started with packed red cell and platelet transfusion. Chest X ray showed the tip of the catheter passing across the midline. The drain was retracted a few cm. Subsequently, CT scan showed the catheter to be in the right pulmonary artery and to be double folded (Fig.1, 2) Furthermore the scan showed that the drain was passing through the lower right lobe with widespread pneumonia. Theoretically, the intervention of choice should be a thoracotomy to remove the drain and to treat the empyema. However, the compromised condition of this patient precluded this. Earlier pre-operative lung function test, conducted before the lobectomy, showed the patient could not undergo a pneumonectomy. Because of findings during the aortic valve replacement we believed that central clamping of the pulmonary artery would be a hazardous procedure and surgery therefore would not be an option. We decided on non-operative treatment and to withdraw the catheter 2-3 cm every day, after complete correction of coagulation. On the fourth day the catheter was outside the intra-thoracic cavity without renewed blood loss. The patient was extubated on day five and transferred to the ward after 7 days. Control CT scan showed no embolism or bleedings (Fig. 3). Heparin was restarted 2 days after removal of the chest tube because of the low flow state in the left ventricle and impaired cardiac function inducing a high risk of thromboembolic complications. During the ICU stay the patient was treated with Flucloxacillin combined with Ceftriaxone. These antibiotics started as empirical treatment while the leg ulcers were the expected source of infection. This was confirmed by the microbiological analysis of the aspirated pus from the empyema was positive for Staphylococcus Aureus. The patient was discharged from the hospital by the twenty first day.
机译:在急诊科,手术室和重症监护室进行胸管插入术(胸腔切开术)是一种常见的程序。将引流管插入肺动脉是一种罕见的但危及生命的并发症。我们报告了一个成功的非手术治疗肺动脉导管插入术后肺动脉损伤的情况。简介胸管插入术(胸腔切开术)通常用于胸腔积脓或气胸的治疗。胸大血管损伤很少见,但已有文献报道。我们报告了一例由插入胸管引起的肺动脉损伤的病例,该患者已在肺动脉中折叠,并且该患者不是开胸手术的候选人。我们对该手术进行了非手术处理并撤回了排水管。临床细节一名63岁的女性因感染性休克和嗜睡症被送往急诊科。六个月前,在检查过程中因主动脉瓣狭窄和二尖瓣关闭不全而被诊断为右上叶腺癌,为此,她接受了右上肺叶切除术(pT1N0M0腺癌),然后在五个月前进行了主动脉瓣置换术(Edward Magna Fase) 。由于上叶肺叶切除术后的粘连,二尖瓣修复不可行。术后心脏功能仍然严重受损。此外,患者患有慢性血栓形成综合症,双腿均有溃疡。该患者需要插管和重症监护病房入院。胸部X线显示胸腔积液。针吸出脓液。手术前未进行CT或超声检查。将一根16 Fr的胸管钝化插入诊断穿刺位置的第四肋间隙。插入后立即将2000毫升血液从引流系统中引出。立即将胸管夹紧。病人降压,开始充盈的红细胞和血小板输注进行复苏。胸部X射线显示导管尖端穿过中线。排水管缩回了几厘米。随后,CT扫描显示导管位于右肺动脉并被双折叠(图1、2)。此外,扫描显示引流管穿过右下叶并伴有广泛的肺炎。从理论上讲,选择的干预措施应该是开胸手术,以消除引流并治疗脓胸。但是,此患者的病情较弱,无法进行此操作。在肺叶切除术之前进行的较早的术前肺功能测试显示该患者无法进行肺切除术。由于主动脉瓣置换过程中的发现,我们认为肺动脉的中心夹紧将是一种危险的手术,因此手术不是一种选择。我们决定采用非手术治疗,并在完全纠正凝血后每天撤回导管2-3 cm。在第四天,导管在胸腔内,没有再次失血。患者在第5天拔管,并在7天后转移到病房。对照CT扫描未见栓塞或出血(图3)。由于左心室的低血流状态和心脏功能受损导致发生血栓栓塞并发症的高风险,肝素在拔出胸管后2天重新开始使用。在重症监护病房期间,患者接受氟氯西林联合头孢曲松治疗。这些抗生素开始作为经验治疗,而腿部溃疡是预期的感染源。通过脓胸的抽吸脓液的微生物学分析证实了金黄色葡萄球菌为阳性。患者在第一天的第二十天就已出院。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号