首页> 外文期刊>The British journal of general practice: the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners >The 'heartsink' patient revisited. The Welsh Philosophy And General Practice discussion Group.
【24h】

The 'heartsink' patient revisited. The Welsh Philosophy And General Practice discussion Group.

机译:“心思病”的病人再次被检查。威尔士哲学与一般实践讨论小组。

获取原文
           

摘要

The term 'heartsink patient' is now part of the vocabulary of general practice. But what and where is the heartsink? How should the phenomenon be studied? What are the implications of differing interpretations for general practice? The heartsink patient presents personal, social, and soteriological (pertaining to salvation) problems in physical terms. This poses a fundamental challenge to the philosophical foundations of general practice. Emphasizing a biomedical role justifies questioning the legitimacy of 'heartsinks' as patients. Alternatively, general practice should reassert its acceptance of suffering, whatever its origin and presentation. This would justify accommodating a far greater range of problems than simply those explained by biomedicine alone, and make general practice soteriological to the core.
机译:现在,“沉思患者”一词已成为一般实践词汇的一部分。但是,心思何在何处?该现象应如何研究?不同的解释对一般实践有何启示?心思病的患者会从身体上提出个人,社会和社会方面的问题(与救赎有关)。这对一般实践的哲学基础提出了根本挑战。强调生物医学的作用正当质疑“沉思者”作为患者的合法性。或者,无论其起源和表现如何,一般惯例都应重申对苦难的接受。与仅用生物医学解释的问题相比,这将有理由解决更大范围的问题,并使一般实践从社会学角度出发。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号