...
【24h】

Palliative care at home: an audit of cancer deaths in Grampian region.

机译:在家中的姑息治疗:对格兰屏地区癌症死亡的审计。

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Ninety per cent of the last year of life of cancer patients is spent at home. Some studies have suggested that care in this setting is often suboptimal. Information on the standard of palliative care delivered at home by general practitioners (GPs) and their teams is limited, and clarification of the problems faced is needed. AIM: To audit the home-based palliative care of patients dying of cancer. METHOD: Matched postal questionnaires were sent to the GPs and nurses of 1086 successive patients dying of cancer in whatever setting in the Grampian region of Scotland some six weeks after the death to establish the professionals' perception of symptom control, communication problems, use of services, and information given to patients and relatives. RESULTS: Response rates were 88.8% for GPs (964 out of 1086) and 87.1% for nurses (325 out of 375 that were passed on to nurses). Two-thirds of patients received palliative care at home. Pain was poorly controlled in 15.7%, and poor control of other symptoms ranged from 13.8% (nausea and vomiting) to 21% (depression and dyspnoea). Communication difficulties were present in 93.7% of cases, although only 5.2% of these were of a major nature. District nurses were involved in 76.7% of cases and Macmillan nurses in 28.0%. Twenty-six per cent of referrals to district nurses were assessed as being late in the course of the illness. Patients were fully informed about the diagnosis in 66.3% of cases and about the prognosis in 55.4%. General practitioners were more likely to report the presence of communication problems between themselves and the patient (when compared with nurses: 43.9% versus 28.0%), more likely to report that patients were 'not at all informed' about self-help groups (57.5% versus 36.3%), and were less likely to report the involvement of occupational therapists (21.8% versus 39.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Levels of reporting of poor symptom control by professionals was much lower than levels reported by relatives in other studies, but there was no difference between the reporting of GPs and nurses. However, a number of areas were identified where care could be enhanced by improved teamwork and further education and training in symptom control, as well as in communication, use of services, and information provision.
机译:背景:癌症患者生命的最后一年中有90%花在了家里。一些研究表明,这种情况下的护理通常不是最佳的。全科医生及其团队在家中提供的姑息治疗标准的信息有限,因此需要澄清所面临的问题。目的:审核癌症死亡患者的家庭姑息治疗。方法:在死亡后约六周,将匹配的邮政问卷发送给1086名连续死亡的癌症患者的全科医生和护士,这些患者死于苏格兰格兰屏地区的任何地点,以了解专业人员对症状控制,沟通问题和服务使用的看法以及提供给患者和亲戚的信息。结果:全科医生的回应率为88.8%(1086名中有964名),护士的回应率为87.1%(375名中的325名被传递给护士)。三分之二的患者在家中接受姑息治疗。疼痛的控制不佳率为15.7%,其他症状的控制不佳范围为13.8%(恶心和呕吐)至21%(抑郁和呼吸困难)。 93.7%的病例存在沟通困难,尽管其中只有5.2%是主要疾病。其中,地区护士占76.7%,麦克米伦护士占28.0%。估计有26%的转诊给地方护士是在病程中迟到的。充分了解患者的诊断信息(占66.3%的病例)和预后(55.4%)。全科医生更有可能报告他们与患者之间存在沟通问题(与护士相比:43.9%比28.0%),更有可能报告患者“根本不了解”自助小组(57.5) %对36.3%),并且不太可能报告职业治疗师的参与(21.8%对39.7%)。结论:专业人士对症状控制不佳的报告水平远低于其他研究中亲属报告的水平,但全科医生和护士的报告之间没有差异。但是,确定了许多领域,可以通过改善团队合作以及在症状控制,交流,服务使用和信息提供方面的进一步教育和培训来加强护理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号