首页> 外文期刊>The British journal of general practice: the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners >Intensive cardiovascular risk factor intervention in a rural practice: a glimmer of hope?
【24h】

Intensive cardiovascular risk factor intervention in a rural practice: a glimmer of hope?

机译:农村实践中密集的心血管危险因素干预:一线希望?

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Large trials of primary care-based health promotion to modify coronary heart disease risks have shown only modest benefits. Could more intensive intervention, with doctors sharing with practice nurses in health promotion, produce better health outcomes in the context of the small family practice? How cost-effective might these interventions be? AIM: To assess the cost-effectiveness of an intensive programme of coronary heart disease (CHD) risk factor modification in a rural general practice in which doctors had a major input. METHOD: A longitudinal study of changes in risk factors in a group of adult patients identified as having one or more major CHD risk factor and monitored for one to seven years. Patients were recruited from and followed up in health promotion clinics, routine practice nurse appointments, or routine doctors' surgeries. All received the practice's routine interventions to modify risk, and changes in risk factors were recorded. Time spent by members of the primary health care team on CHD health promotion was recorded over a two-year period. RESULTS: From a practice list of 2040, 760 patients with one or more CHD risk factors were identified and followed up over a mean of 3.61 years (range six months to seven years). Significant improvements in each of the risk factors occurred, except in body mass index (BMI). Mean Dundee risk scores fell from 7.4 to 5.7 (by 23.3%). The annual cost to the practice (including doctorurse/secretarial time plus sundry practice expenses and laboratory costs, but excluding drug costs) was 6000 pounds. Cost per coronary death prevented was calculated as approximately 10,000 pounds. CONCLUSION: The results show an effect on risk factors broadly similar but slightly greater in magnitude than that achieved in the OXCHECK and British Family Heart Studies of nurse-delivered risk factor intervention in primary care. The results suggest that more intensive effort in lifestyle modification and health promotion, with more active involvement of doctors, could produce significant additional benefit. The cost-effectiveness of this approach compares favourably with many other accepted measures in coronary heart disease prevention.
机译:背景:基于初级保健的健康促进改变冠心病风险的大型试验仅显示了适度的益处。在小家庭实践的背景下,如果医生与执业护士分享健康促进方面的更多强化干预措施,会产生更好的健康结果?这些干预措施的成本效益如何?目的:评估在农村普遍实践中,医生有大量投入的强化冠心病(CHD)危险因素修改计划的成本效益。方法:对一组确定为患有一种或多种主要冠心病危险因素的成年患者中危险因素变化的纵向研究,并进行了1至7年的监测。从健康促进诊所,例行执业护士任命或例行医生手术中招募患者并进行随访。所有患者均接受了惯例的常规干预措施以改变风险,并记录了风险因素的变化。记录了两年期间初级卫生保健团队成员在冠心病健康促进上花费的时间。结果:从2040年的实践清单中,鉴定出760名具有一种或多种冠心病危险因素的患者,平均随访时间为3.61年(六个月至七年不等)。除体重指数(BMI)以外,每种风险因素均发生了显着改善。邓迪平均风险评分从7.4下降到5.7(下降23.3%)。每年的执业费用(包括医生/护士/秘书时间加上各种执业费用和实验室费用,但不包括药物费用)为6000磅。预防每例冠状动脉死亡的成本约为10,000磅。结论:结果表明,对危险因素的影响与OXCHECK和英国家庭心脏研究在初级保健中由护士提供的危险因素干预措施大致相同,但幅度稍大。结果表明,在医生的更多积极参与下,生活方式的改善和健康促进方面的更多投入可能会产生显着的额外收益。该方法的成本效益与预防冠心病的许多其他公认措施相比具有优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号