...
首页> 外文期刊>The British journal of general practice: the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners >Randomized controlled trial of general practitioner versus usual medical care in a suburban accident and emergency department using an informal triage system.
【24h】

Randomized controlled trial of general practitioner versus usual medical care in a suburban accident and emergency department using an informal triage system.

机译:使用非正式分类系统在郊区急诊室进行的全科医生与常规医疗保健的随机对照试验。

获取原文
           

摘要

We determined if care provided by general practitioners (GPs) to non-emergency patients, in a suburban accident and emergency (A&E) department using an informal triage system, differs significantly from care provided by usual A&E staff. One thousand eight hundred and seventy-eight patients participated. By comparison with usual A&E staff, GPs prescribed significantly more often (percentage relative difference [% RD] = 12 [95% confidence interval = 1-23]) and referred more patients to hospital (% RD = 21 [95% CI = 9-33]). This is the first study to report that sessional GPs working in an A&E department utilize similar or more resources than usual A&E staff. It emphasizes the need for the continued audit of initiatives that have been introduced into new settings.
机译:我们确定了在郊区的急诊(A&E)部门使用非正式分类系统的全科医生(GPs)为非急诊患者提供的护理是否与普通A&E员工提供的护理显着不同。 178例患者参加了研究。与普通的急诊人员相比,全科医生处方处方的频率更高(相对差异百分比[%RD] = 12 [95%置信区间= 1-23]),并且转诊的病人更多(%RD = 21 [95%CI = 9] -33])。这是第一项报告说,在急诊室工作的会诊全科医生使用的资源比普通急诊人员多或少。它强调需要继续审核引入新环境的计划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号