...
首页> 外文期刊>The British journal of general practice: the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners >Provision of care to general practice patients with disabling long-term mental illness: a survey in 16 practices.
【24h】

Provision of care to general practice patients with disabling long-term mental illness: a survey in 16 practices.

机译:为患有长期精神疾病的全科患者提供护理:一项针对16种实践的调查。

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND. Increasing numbers of long-term mentally ill people now live in the community, many of whom lose contact with psychiatric services and come to depend on general practitioners for medical care. However, it has been suggested that general practitioners may be unaware of some of these patients and their needs. AIM. This study set out to investigate the care received by this group of patients. METHOD. Case registers of adults disabled by long-term mental illness were set up in 16 of 110 group general practices asked to participate. A search of each practice's record systems was combined with a survey of local psychiatric and social service teams, to seek practice patients who might not be identified from the general practice data. RESULTS. Of the 440 patients found, 90% were identified from information within the practices, mainly computerized repeat prescription and diagnostic data. The other 10% were identified only by psychiatric services. Over one third of the patients had no current contact with psychiatric services. Patients in contact with psychiatric services had been ill for a shorter time than those not in contact. More patients suffering from psychotic illnesses were in current contact than those with non-psychotic diagnoses. Over 90% of the patients had been seen by their general practitioners within 12 months, on average eight times. Most consultations were for minor physical disorders, repeat prescriptions and sickness certificates. Elements of the formal mental state examination were recorded in one third of cases and adjustments of psychotropic medication in one fifth. CONCLUSION. These findings suggest that patients in long-term contact with specialist services cannot be taken as representative of the whole population with long-term mental illness. General practitioners could use their frequent contacts with long-term mentally ill people to play a greater role in monitoring the mental state and drug treatment of this group.
机译:背景。现在,越来越多的长期精神疾病患者生活在社区中,其中许多人失去了与精神病学服务的联系,并依赖全科医生来提供医疗服务。但是,已经建议全科医生可能不了解其中一些患者及其需求。目标。这项研究旨在调查这一组患者所接受的护理。方法。在要求参加的110组普通实践中,有16种建立了患有长期精神疾病的残疾成年人的病例记录。对每个执业记录系统的搜索与对当地精神病和社会服务团队的调查相结合,以寻找可能无法从一般执业数据中识别出的执业患者。结果。在发现的440例患者中,有90%的患者是从实践中的信息中识别出来的,这些信息主要是计算机重复处方和诊断数据。其余10%仅通过精神科服务确定。超过三分之一的患者目前没有接触精神科服务。与未接触精神病患者接触的患者患病的时间较短。与非精神病诊断者相比,目前与精神病患者联系的人数更多。全科医生在12个月内看过90%以上的患者,平均八次。大多数咨询是针对轻微的身体疾病,重复处方和疾病证明。三分之一的病例记录了正式的精神状态检查内容,五分之一的病例记录了精神药物调整情况。结论。这些发现表明,长期接触专家服务的患者不能被视为长期精神疾病患者的代表。全科医生可以利用他们与长期患有精神疾病的人的频繁接触在监测这一群体的精神状态和药物治疗中发挥更大的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号