...
首页> 外文期刊>The British journal of general practice: the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners >How general practitioners manage children with urinary tract infection: an audit in the former Northern Region.
【24h】

How general practitioners manage children with urinary tract infection: an audit in the former Northern Region.

机译:全科医生如何处理患有尿路感染的儿童:原北部地区的审核。

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) in childhood are common and may be difficult to diagnose because of non-specific symptoms and technical problems with urine collection. Active management is important because UTIs may cause permanent renal scarring in young children. AIM: To determine how general practitioners (GPs) manage children with suspected UTIs. METHOD: A postal questionnaire to 494 GPs in the former Northern Region (a random selection of 26.2%) asking how they manage children with suspected UTI and their perception of their training needs. RESULTS: A total of 333 (67.4%) GPs replied. On weekdays, up to 22.9% of GPs treated children who had symptoms suggestive of UTI without collecting a diagnostic urine sample, and up to 64.8% did so at weekends. Urine collection was satisfactory in 73.2% of boys and girls aged under one year, but in only 50.4% of older boys and 48.0% of older girls, caused in part by the use of unreliably 'cleaned' potties in the older group. On weekdays, up to 87.2% of GPs culture the urine, but up to 4.8% use dipsticks as the sole diagnostic test; at weekends, only up to 58.6% culture urines, and up to 19.1% rely on dipsticks alone. Up to 11.0% of GPs examine urine under a microscope for bacteria to test for UTI on weekdays and at weekends. Up to 23.8% of GPs who collect urines on weekdays wait for a positive culture result before starting antibiotics. At weekends, only 3.9% of GPs build in this delay to treatment, mainly because far fewer take urine samples at all. GPs refer younger children for diagnostic imaging more readily than older ones, and boys more readily than girls at all ages. Although virtually all GPs refer all children under five years, some still do so only after recurrent infections. Over half the GPs wanted more training in managing UTI in children. CONCLUSION: There is a wide variation in clinical practice by GPs. Some always appropriately collect and test urine samples, treat without delay and refer for imaging after one proven UTI. Some never collect urines, treat blindly and refer only young infants with recurrent UTIs. Many vary their standards of practice from weekdays to weekends. The provision for GPs of clear, local, practical guidelines, drawn up between paediatricians and GPs and backed up with study days, might produce a consistent improvement in standards.
机译:背景:儿童时期的尿路感染(UTI)很常见,由于非特异性症状和收集尿液的技术问题,可能难以诊断。积极管理很重要,因为尿路感染可能导致幼儿永久性肾脏瘢痕形成。目的:确定全科医生(GP)如何管理患有可疑UTI的儿童。方法:对北部北部地区的494名GP进行邮政问卷调查(随机选择26.2%),询问他们如何管理可疑UTI患儿以及他们对培训需求的看法。结果:共有333名(67.4%)GP的答复。在工作日中,多达22.9%的GP接受治疗的儿童在未收集诊断性尿液样本的情况下提示具有UTI症状,而多达64.8%的儿童在周末这样做。一岁以下男孩和女孩的尿液收集令人满意,占73.2%,但只有50.4%的男孩和48.0%的女孩,部分原因是在老年人组中使用了不可靠的“清洁”便盆。在工作日中,多达87.2%的GP会培养尿液,但高达4.8%的人会使用试纸作为唯一的诊断测试;在周末,仅多达58.6%的培养尿液,而多达19.1%的尿液仅依靠量油尺。多达11.0%的GP在工作日和周末在显微镜下检查尿液中的细菌以检测UTI。在工作日收集尿液的全科医生中,多达23.8%的人在开始使用抗生素之前要等待阳性培养结果。在周末,只有3.9%的全科医生会延误治疗,这主要是因为很少采集尿液样本。全科医生将年龄较大的孩子比年龄较大的孩子更容易进行诊断成像,而各个年龄段的男孩都比女孩更容易进行诊断。尽管几乎所有的全科医生都将所有5岁以下的儿童都转给了孩子,但有些人只有在反复感染后才这样做。超过一半的全科医生希望接受更多有关儿童尿路感染管理方面的培训。结论:GP的临床实践存在很大差异。有些人总是会适当地收集和测试尿液样本,立即进行治疗,并在一种经过验证的泌尿道感染后进行影像检查。有些人从不收集尿液,盲目治疗,仅转诊患有复发性尿路感染的婴儿。从工作日到周末,许多人会改变他们的练习标准。儿科医生和全科医生之间制定的,明确的,当地的,实用的指导方针的GP可能会产生标准方面的持续改进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号