...
首页> 外文期刊>The British journal of general practice: the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners >Is personal continuity of care compatible with free choice of doctor? Patients' views on seeing the same doctor.
【24h】

Is personal continuity of care compatible with free choice of doctor? Patients' views on seeing the same doctor.

机译:个人护理的连续性与医生的自由选择是否兼容?病人对同一位医生的看法。

获取原文
           

摘要

While much has been written about the benefits of personal continuity of care there has been little research about the views of patients. In this cross sectional study 111 patients from three group practices (one of which ran a personal list system) were interviewed at home within a week of consulting a general practitioner. Patients were selected randomly from a systematic series of consulting sessions and a semi-structured interview was administered. Patients receiving more personal continuity of care were likely to be older, to have booked their most recent appointment further in advance, to desire personal continuity of care, to have an external health locus of control and to have a lower extroversion score. In the practice with a personal list, patients had a high level of continuity of care, were satisfied and showed little interest in having a choice of doctor. In the combined list practices patients valued their choice of doctor but often could not exercise it enough and they were more critical. They made more suggestions for change than those in the practice with a personal list system, mostly about receptionists and appointments. It is concluded that most patients like to see the same doctor, but they may not be willing to wait two days for this if there is a quicker option. It may be difficult to deliver both personal continuity of care and choice in group practice.
机译:尽管有关个人连续性护理的好处的文献很多,但很少有关于患者观点的研究。在这项横断面研究中,在咨询全科医生的一周内,在家中对来自三个小组诊所(其中一个小组运行了个人清单系统)的111名患者进行了访谈。从系统的一系列咨询会议中随机选择患者,并进行半结构式访谈。接受更多个人连续性护理的患者可能年龄更大,提前预订了最近的约会,期望个人连续性护理,具有外部健康控制源并具有较低的外向得分。在有个人名单的实践中,患者的护理连续性很高,很满意,对选择医生的兴趣也很小。在综合清单操作中,患者珍视他们选择的医生,但常常不能足够地行使医生的选择,因此他们更为严格。他们提出的更改建议比个人列表系统中的更改建议多,主要是关于接待员和约会的建议。结论是,大多数患者喜欢看同一位医生,但是如果有更快的选择,他们可能不愿意等待两天。在团体实践中,既难以提供个人护理的连续性,又难以做出选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号