...
首页> 外文期刊>The British journal of general practice: the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners >Liberating the NHS or trapping doctors?: The effects of NHS reform on today and tomorrow
【24h】

Liberating the NHS or trapping doctors?: The effects of NHS reform on today and tomorrow

机译:放开NHS还是困​​住医生?:NHS改革对今天和明天的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

The coalition government recently revealed the ambitious task of ‘liberating the NHS’, a goal identified as the widest reforming change that the NHS has seen since its inception in 1948.1 The White Paper2 champions ideological aims to empower doctors while placing patients at the centre of their own management decisions, adopting the maxim ‘no decision about me, without me’.2 While such proposals have been optimistically publicised, on the surface heralding empowerment for both doctors and patients and rightly so, they nevertheless raise a pertinent question: is the motive to actually empower doctors or is it simply a shift of responsibility? At a time when there is financial pressure to cut costs of public services, many might cynically think that this is a way of government conveniently devolving the responsibility for ‘cuts’ which are soon to come; however, Mr Lansley did suggest some of the proposals in the White Paper before the global economic downturn.
机译:联合政府最近透露了“解放国民保健服务”的宏伟任务,这一目标被确定为国民保健服务自1948.1年成立以来所经历的最广泛的改革变革。白皮书2倡导的意识形态目标是赋予医生权力,同时将患者置于他们的中心位置。自己的管理决策,采用的格言是“对我没有决定,就没有我”。2尽管对这些提议进行了乐观的宣传,但表面上预示着对医生和患者的权力,尽管如此,他们仍然提出了一个相关的问题:动机是什么?真正赋予医生权力,还是仅仅是责任转移?在存在削减公共服务成本的财务压力之时,许多人可能会愤世嫉俗地认为,这是政府便利地转移即将到来的“削减”责任的一种方式。但是,兰斯利先生在全球经济下滑之前确实在白皮书中提出了一些建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号