...
首页> 外文期刊>The Indian journal of medical research >Comparison of clinical effects of beclomethasone dipropionate & budesonide in treatment of children with mild persistent asthma: A double-blind, randomized, controlled study
【24h】

Comparison of clinical effects of beclomethasone dipropionate & budesonide in treatment of children with mild persistent asthma: A double-blind, randomized, controlled study

机译:倍氯米松双丙酸酯和布地奈德治疗儿童轻度持续性哮喘的临床效果比较:一项双盲,随机对照研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background & objectives: Various inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are available to control the symptoms of asthma. Although beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) and budesonide (BUD) are one of the oldest ICSs, their wide availability and low cost make them attractive options in developing countries. Due to lack of consensus on which of the two drugs is better for controlling mild persistent asthma, we undertook this study to compare the efficacy of these two drugs by measuring the change in percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV 1 ) from baseline in children with mild persistent asthma. Methods: A double-blind, randomized, parallel group study was conducted in children 7-15 yr of age with newly diagnosed asthma. Of the 85 cases of mild persistent asthma, 42 received BUD while 43 received BDP at a dose of 400 μg/day using pressurized metered-dose inhaler with valved spacer for two months. The outcomes measured were change in FEV 1 , symptom scores and side effects. Results: There was a significant (P 1 in BUD group (98.43 ± 4.63%) than in BDP group (95.65 ± 5.66%) at the end of two months of treatment. The mean symptom scores in BUD group (0.28 ± 1.22) and BDP group (0.43 ± 1.52) were comparable after two months. No side effects were seen in either group. Interpretation & conclusions: FEV 1 was significantly greater in BUD group than BDP group. Improvement in symptoms and incidence of side effects were similar. Our findings indicate that both BDP and BUD can be used effectively in the management of children with mild persistent asthma. [CTRI No: CTRI/2013/03/003495].
机译:背景与目的:多种吸入性糖皮质激素(ICSs)可用于控制哮喘症状。尽管倍氯米松双丙酸酯(BDP)和布地奈德(BUD)是最古老的ICS之一,但它们的广泛可用性和低成本使其成为发展中国家的诱人选择。由于在哪种药物对控制轻度持续性哮喘方面尚无共识,我们进行了这项研究,以通过测量一秒钟内预测的强制呼气量百分比的变化来比较这两种药物的疗效(FEV 1 )从轻度持续性哮喘患儿的基线开始。方法:对7-15岁的新诊断哮喘儿童进行了双盲,随机,平行分组研究。在85例轻度持续性哮喘患者中,有42例接受BUD,而43例使用带阀间隔器的加压计量吸入器以400μg/天的剂量接受BDP治疗两个月。测量的结局是FEV 1 的变化,症状评分和副作用。结果:治疗两个月结束时,BUD组的P 1 (98.43±4.63%)显着高于BDP组的95.65±5.66%(PUD),BUD组的平均症状评分为0.28。两个月后,两组之间无差异[±1.22)和BDP组(0.43±1.52),两组均未见副作用。解释与结论:BUD组的FEV 1 明显大于BDP组。症状和副作用的发生率相似,我们的研究结果表明BDP和BUD均可有效治疗轻度持续性哮喘患儿[CTRI No:CTRI / 2013/03/003495]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号