首页> 外文期刊>The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition Logic and Communication >Functional Unit Classifiers in (Non)-Classifier Russian
【24h】

Functional Unit Classifiers in (Non)-Classifier Russian

机译:(非)分类器俄语中的功能单元分类器

获取原文
           

摘要

It has often been argued that functional individuating classifiers and plural count nouns ought to be in complementary distribution (e.g. Borer 2005, Chierchia 2010). This apparently works neatly for Chinese and English. Russian, however, is an interesting case. On the one hand it has count nouns which can be directly modified by numerals. On the other hand it has three classifiers, ?tuka ‘item’, ?elovek ‘person’ and golova ‘head’, which optionally occur in numeral constructions with plural nouns and look very much like functional individuating classifiers (cf. Sussex 1976, Yadroff 1999). I show that a closer look at the data reveals that apparently count constructions using these optional classifiers have properties of measure constructions such as five liters of water. Based on that I argue that these classifiers are not individuating classifiers but are measure words which measure mass denotations in terms of natural units in the sense of Krifka (1989, 1995).
机译:经常有人争辩说,功能个性化分类器和复数名词应该是互补分布的(例如Borer 2005,Chierchia 2010)。这显然适用于中文和英文。但是,俄语是一个有趣的例子。一方面,它具有可通过数字直接修改的计数名词。另一方面,它具有三个分类器,?tuka'item',?elovek'person'和golova'head',它们可选地出现在带有复数名词的数字结构中,并且看起来非常类似于功能性个体化分类器(参见Sussex 1976,Yadroff 1999)。我显示,仔细查看数据可以发现,使用这些可选分类器的计数构造显然具有测量构造的特性,例如5升水。基于此,我认为这些分类器不是个体化的分类器,而是度量词,按照Krifka(1989,1995)的意义以自然单位来度量质量表示。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号