首页> 外文期刊>Technical Gazette >Text readability and legibility on iPad with comparison to paper and computer screen
【24h】

Text readability and legibility on iPad with comparison to paper and computer screen

机译:与纸和计算机屏幕相比,iPad上的文本可读性和可读性

获取原文
           

摘要

In this paper authors examine readability and legibility of text on iPad and compare it partially to reading from computer screen and paper. Following previous research, two independent variables were measured: speed of reading (T) and subjective difficulty of reading (Z). 220 university students aged 18÷48 participated in the experiment and were divided into 11 groups of 20 participants. Key findings are as follows: Sans serif Gotham font is more readable and legible on iPad than Minion Pro serif font, although, when presented in bigger font sizes there is no significant difference between the two letter cases; two column spread of text was the hardest to read, giving fewer number of characters per row; layout of text with 79 characters per row and above should be readable and legible enough for reading texts on iPad; considering quality of reading, texts displayed on iPad can replace texts printed on paper.
机译:在本文中,作者检查了iPad上文本的可读性和可读性,并将其部分与从计算机屏幕和纸张上读取的内容进行了比较。根据先前的研究,测量了两个独立变量:阅读速度(T)和主观阅读难度(Z)。 220名18到48岁的大学生参加了实验,分为11组,每组20人。主要发现如下:与Minion Pro衬线字体相比,Sans serif Gotham字体在iPad上更具可读性和可读性,尽管当以较大字体显示时,两种字母的情况之间没有显着差异。两列文字很难阅读,每行字符数更少;每行及以上79个字符的文本布局应清晰易读,足以在iPad上阅读文本;考虑到阅读质量,iPad上显示的文本可以替代打印在纸上的文本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号