...
首页> 外文期刊>Public Health Nutrition >Household food insecurity: a systematic review of the measuring instruments used in epidemiological studies
【24h】

Household food insecurity: a systematic review of the measuring instruments used in epidemiological studies

机译:家庭粮食不安全:流行病学研究中使用的测量工具的系统综述

获取原文
           

摘要

Abstract Objective To conduct a systematic review aimed at identifying and characterizing the experience-based household food security scales and to synthesize their psychometric properties. Design Search in the MEDLINE, LILACS and SciELO databases, using the descriptors (a€?food insecuritya€? OR a€?food securitya€?) AND (a€?questionnairesa€? OR a€?scalesa€? OR a€?validitya€? OR a€?reliabilitya€?). There was no limitation on the period of publication. All articles had their titles and abstracts analysed by two reviewers. The studies of interest were read in their entirety and the relevant information extracted using a standard form. Results The initial bibliographic search identified 299 articles. Of these, the 159 that seemed to meet the criteria for inclusion were read fully. After consultation of the bibliographic references of these articles, twenty articles and five documents were added, as they satisfied the previously determined criteria for inclusion. Twenty-four different instruments were identified; all were brief and of easy application. The majority were devised in the USA. Forty-seven references reported results of psychometric studies. The instruments that presented the highest number of psychometric studies were the Core Food Security Measurement/Household Food Security Survey Module (CFSM/HFSSM) and the Self-Perceived Household Food Security Scale. Conclusions There are a number of structured scales available in the literature for characterization of household food insecurity. However, despite some psychometric studies already existing about the majority of the instruments, it is observed that, except for the studies of the CFSM/HFSSM, these are still restricted to appraisal of a few aspects of reliability and validity.
机译:摘要目的进行系统的评估,以鉴定和表征基于经验的家庭粮食安全量表,并综合其心理计量学特征。使用描述符(“食品不安全”或“食品安全”)和(“ questionnairesa”或“ scalesa”或“ a”)在MEDLINE,LILACS和SciELO数据库中进行设计搜索。有效性或可靠性)。出版期限没有限制。所有文章的标题和摘要均由两名审稿人进行分析。完整阅读了感兴趣的研究,并使用标准表格提取了相关信息。结果最初的书目搜索确定了299篇文章。其中,有159个看似符合纳入标准的书已被完整阅读。在查阅了这些文章的书目参考之后,增加了二十篇文章和五份文件,因为它们满足了先前确定的收录标准。确定了二十四种不同的手段。一切都很简短且易于应用。大多数是在美国设计的。 47个参考文献报告了心理测量学研究的结果。进行心理计量研究最多的工具是核心粮食安全衡量/家庭粮食安全调查模块(CFSM / HFSSM)和自知家庭粮食安全量表。结论文献中有许多结构化量表可用于表征家庭粮食不安全状况。然而,尽管已经对大多数仪器进行了一些心理测量研究,但可以观察到,除了对CFSM / HFSSM的研究以外,这些仍仅限于评估可靠性和有效性的几个方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号