首页> 外文期刊>Npj - Primary Care Respiratory Medicine >Development and outcomes of a primary care-based sleep assessment service in Canterbury, New Zealand
【24h】

Development and outcomes of a primary care-based sleep assessment service in Canterbury, New Zealand

机译:新西兰坎特伯雷的基于初级保健的睡眠评估服务的发展和结果

获取原文
           

摘要

Prior to 2007, increasing demand for sleep services, plus inability to adequately triage severity, led to long delays in sleep assessment and accessing continuous positive airway pressure. We established a community sleep assessment service carried out by trained general practices using a standardised tool and overnight oximetry. All cases were discussed at a multi-disciplinary meeting, with four outcomes: severe obstructive sleep apnoea treated with continuous positive airway pressure; investigation with more complex studies; sleep physician appointment; no or non-severe sleep disorder for general practitioner management. Assessment numbers increased steadily (~400 in 2007 vs. 1400 in 2015). Median time from referral to assessment and multi-disciplinary meeting was 28 and 48 days, respectively. After the first multi-disciplinary meeting, 23% of cases were assessed as having severe obstructive sleep apnoea. More complex studies (mostly flow based) were required in 49% of patients, identifying severe obstructive sleep apnoea in a further 13%. Thirty-seven percent of patients had obstructive sleep apnoea severe enough to qualify for funded treatment. Forty-eight percent of patients received a definitive answer from the first multi-disciplinary meeting. Median time from referral to continuous positive airway pressure for 鈥榓t risk鈥?patients with severe obstructive sleep apnoea, e.g., commercial drivers, was 49 days, while patients with severe obstructive sleep apnoea but not 鈥榓t risk鈥?waited 261 days for continuous positive airway pressure. Ten percent of patients required polysomnography, and 4% saw a sleep specialist. In conclusion, establishment of a community sleep assessment service and sleep multi-disciplinary meeting led to significantly more assessments, with short waiting times for treatment, especially in high-risk patients with severe obstructive sleep apnoea. Most patients can be assessed without more complex studies or face-to-face review by a sleep specialist.
机译:在2007年之前,对睡眠服务的需求不断增加,加上无法充分分流严重程度,导致睡眠评估的长期延误和获得持续的气道正压通气。我们建立了一个社区睡眠评估服务,该服务由经过培训的一般实践人员使用标准化工具和通宵测氧仪进行。在多学科会议上讨论了所有病例,有四个结果:持续气道正压通气治疗严重阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停;通过更复杂的研究进行调查;睡眠医师预约;全科医生管理没有或没有严重的睡眠障碍。评估数量稳步增长(2007年约为400,2015年为1400)。从转诊到评估和多学科会议的中位数时间分别为28天和48天。在第一次跨学科会议之后,评估出23%的病例患有严重的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停。 49%的患者需要更复杂的研究(主要基于血流),另外13%的患者发现严重阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停。 37%的患者患有严重阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停,足以接受资助治疗。第一次多学科会议中有48%的患者得到了明确的答案。重度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(例如商业驾驶员)患者从转诊到持续气道正压的中位时间为49天,而重度阻塞性呼吸暂停但不是“高风险”患者则等待261天持续的气道正压。 10%的患者需要进行多导睡眠监测,而4%的患者需要睡眠专家。总之,社区睡眠评估服务和睡眠多学科会议的建立导致评估大大增加,等待治疗的时间较短,特别是在严重阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的高危患者中。无需进行更复杂的研究或由睡眠专家进行面对面的评估即可评估大多数患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号