首页> 外文期刊>Pravoprimenenie >ИНЫЕ МЕРЫ УГОЛОВНО-ПРАВОВОГО ХАРАКТЕРА: ПОНЯТИЕ, ЮРИДИЧЕСКАЯ ПРИРОДА, СИСТЕМА
【24h】

ИНЫЕ МЕРЫ УГОЛОВНО-ПРАВОВОГО ХАРАКТЕРА: ПОНЯТИЕ, ЮРИДИЧЕСКАЯ ПРИРОДА, СИСТЕМА

机译:刑事法律性质的其他措施:概念,法律性质,制度

获取原文
           

摘要

УДК 343 The article is devoted to the analysis of the concept of the legal nature and the system of other measures of criminallegal nature, specified in the Criminal legislation of the Russian Federation and the problems of application of these measures in the judicial practice. The author pays attention to the fact that these measures are quite common in the judicial practice, especially conditional sentence. The legislator establishes three of other measures of criminal-legal nature in section VI of the RF Criminal Code: compulsory measures of a medical nature, confiscation of property and judicial penalty. But the author of the article aims to prove that the system of other measures of criminal-legal nature is not exhausted by these three measures. The article substantiates the statement that the measures in question constitute independent institute of criminal law. The author analyzes in details the concept and the legal nature of other measures of criminal-legal nature, their difference from punishment. Since the other measures of criminal-legal character are varied and specific, the author considers that it is difficult to formulate a general definition of such measures. The author distinguishes three approaches in the theory of criminal law on the question about the system of measures under consideration: "wide", "narrow" and "balanced approach." The author adheres to the "balanced approach" and justifies the statement that the organization of other measures of criminal-legal nature can only be based on their legal nature. This leads to the conclusion that conditional sentence, postponement of punishment, postponement of punishment for drug addicts, compulsory measures of educational influence, compulsory measures of medical nature connected with the execution of the sentence should be referred to other measures ofcriminal law. The author substantiates the view that the legislator's decision about systematization of measures considered in Section VI of the RF Criminal Code is inconsistent and illogical. According to the author, the confiscation of property should be provided in the criminal legislation not as other measure of criminal law, but as an additional kind of punishment. Judicial fine should be excluded from the Criminal Code. Because of their specificity and diversity it is hardly expedient to allocate all the other measures of criminal-legal nature in one section of the RF Criminal Code.
机译:УДК343该文章致力于分析俄罗斯联邦刑法中规定的法律性质概念和其他刑事法律性质的措施系统,以及这些措施在司法实践中的应用问题。作者注意到这些措施在司法实践中相当普遍,特别是有条件的判决。立法者在《联邦刑法》第六节中确立了其他三种刑事法律性质的措施:医疗性质的强制措施,没收财产和司法处罚。但是,本文的作者旨在证明,这三种措施并没有用尽其他具有刑事法律性质的措施体系。该条证实了有关措施构成独立的刑法研究所的说法。作者详细分析了其他刑事法律手段的概念和法律性质,以及它们与刑罚的区别。由于其他刑事法律性质的措施是多种多样和具体的,因此作者认为很难为这些措施制定一个一般定义。作者在刑法理论中就所考虑的措施体系问题区分了三种方法:“广泛”,“狭窄”和“平衡方法”。作者坚持“平衡的方法”,并证明以下说法是合理的:其他具有刑事法律性质的措施的组织只能基于其法律性质。由此得出结论,应将有条件刑罚,推迟对吸毒者的处罚,推迟对吸毒成瘾者的处罚,强制性的教育影响措施,与执行刑罚相关的医疗性质的强制性措施,都应参考其他刑法措施。作者证实了以下观点:立法者关于《 RF刑法》第六节所考虑的措施系统化的决定是不一致且不合逻辑的。提交人认为,没收财产应在刑法中规定,而不是作为刑法的其他措施,而应作为另一种处罚。司法罚款应排除在《刑法》之外。由于其特殊性和多样性,将所有其他具有刑事法律性质的措施分配给《 RF刑法典》的一部分几乎是不方便的。
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号