...
首页> 外文期刊>PLoS One >Reexamining Sample Size Requirements for Multivariate, Abundance-Based Community Research: When Resources are Limited, the Research Does Not Have to Be
【24h】

Reexamining Sample Size Requirements for Multivariate, Abundance-Based Community Research: When Resources are Limited, the Research Does Not Have to Be

机译:重新检查多变量,基于丰度的社区研究的样本大小要求:资源有限时,不必进行研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Community ecologists commonly perform multivariate techniques (e.g., ordination, cluster analysis) to assess patterns and gradients of taxonomic variation. A critical requirement for a meaningful statistical analysis is accurate information on the taxa found within an ecological sample. However, oversampling (too many individuals counted per sample) also comes at a cost, particularly for ecological systems in which identification and quantification is substantially more resource consuming than the field expedition itself. In such systems, an increasingly larger sample size will eventually result in diminishing returns in improving any pattern or gradient revealed by the data, but will also lead to continually increasing costs. Here, we examine 396 datasets: 44 previously published and 352 created datasets. Using meta-analytic and simulation-based approaches, the research within the present paper seeks (1) to determine minimal sample sizes required to produce robust multivariate statistical results when conducting abundance-based, community ecology research. Furthermore, we seek (2) to determine the dataset parameters (i.e., evenness, number of taxa, number of samples) that require larger sample sizes, regardless of resource availability. We found that in the 44 previously published and the 220 created datasets with randomly chosen abundances, a conservative estimate of a sample size of 58 produced the same multivariate results as all larger sample sizes. However, this minimal number varies as a function of evenness, where increased evenness resulted in increased minimal sample sizes. Sample sizes as small as 58 individuals are sufficient for a broad range of multivariate abundance-based research. In cases when resource availability is the limiting factor for conducting a project (e.g., small university, time to conduct the research project), statistically viable results can still be obtained with less of an investment.
机译:社区生态学家通常使用多元技术(例如,排序,聚类分析)来评估分类学变异的模式和梯度。有意义的统计分析的一个关键要求是在生态样本中找到有关分类单元的准确信息。但是,过度采样(每个样本计数的个人过多)也要付出代价,特别是对于生态系统,在生态系统中,识别和量化比实地考察本身要消耗更多的资源。在这样的系统中,越来越大的样本量最终将导致收益减少,从而无法改善数据显示的任何模式或梯度,但也会导致成本不断增加。在这里,我们检查了396个数据集:44个先前发布的数据集和352个创建的数据集。使用基于元分析和基于模拟的方法,本文中的研究寻求(1)确定在进行基于丰度的社区生态学研究时,产生可靠的多元统计结果所需的最小样本量。此外,我们寻求(2)确定需要更大样本量的数据集参数(即均匀度,分类单元数,样本数),而与资源可用性无关。我们发现,在先前发布的44个数据集和220个创建的具有随机选择的丰度的数据集中,对58个样本量的保守估计产生了与所有较大样本量相同的多元结果。但是,此最小数量随均匀度而变化,增加均匀度会导致最小样本量增加。样本数量小至58个个体就足以用于基于多元丰度的广泛研究。如果资源的可用性是进行项目的限制因素(例如,小型大学,开展研究项目的时间),则仍可以用较少的投资获得统计上可行的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号