首页> 外文期刊>PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases >A Re-Examination of the History of Etiologic Confusion between Dengue and Chikungunya
【24h】

A Re-Examination of the History of Etiologic Confusion between Dengue and Chikungunya

机译:登革热与基孔肯雅热病因混淆史的再研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Contrary to the perception of many researchers that the recent invasion of chikungunya (CHIK) in the Western Hemisphere marked the first episode in history, a recent publication reminded them that CHIK had prevailed in the West Indies and southern regions of the United States from 1827–1828 under the guise of “dengue” (DEN), and that many old outbreaks of so-called “dengue” actually represented the CHIK cases erroneously identified as “dengue.” In hindsight, this confusion was unavoidable, given that the syndromes of the two diseases—transmitted by the same mosquito vector in urban areas—are very similar, and that specific laboratory-based diagnostic techniques for these diseases did not exist prior to 1940. While past reviewers reclassified problematic “dengue” outbreaks as CHIK, primarily based on manifestation of arthralgia as a marker of CHIK, they neither identified the root cause of the alleged misdiagnosis nor did they elaborate on the negative consequences derived from it. This article presents a reconstructed history of the genesis of the clinical definition of dengue by emphasizing problems with the definition, subsequent confusion with CHIK, and the ways in which physicians dealt with the variation in dengue-like (“dengue”) syndromes. Then, the article identifies in those records several factors complicating reclassification, based on current practice and standards. These factors include terms used for characterizing joint problems, style of documenting outbreak data, frequency of manifestation of arthralgia, possible involvement of more than one agent, and occurrence of the principal vector. The analysis of those factors reveals that while some of the old “dengue” outbreaks, including the 1827–1828 outbreaks in the Americas, are compatible with CHIK, similar reclassification of other “dengue” outbreaks to CHIK is difficult because of a combination of the absence of pathognomonic syndrome in these diseases and conflicting background information.
机译:与许多研究人员的看法相反,最近对西半球的基孔肯雅热(CHIK)的入侵标志着历史上的第一次发作,最近的出版物提醒他们,CHIK自1827年以来在美国的西印度群岛和南部地区盛行。 1828年以“登革热”(DEN)为幌子,许多旧的所谓“登革热”暴发实际上代表了被错误识别为“登革热”的CHIK病例。事后看来,这种混乱是不可避免的,因为两种疾病的综合征(由同一蚊媒在城市地区传播)非常相似,并且在1940年之前不存在针对这些疾病的专门基于实验室的诊断技术。以往的评论者主要根据关节痛的表现将其归类为“ CHIK”,将有问题的“登革热”暴发重新分类为“ CHIK”,他们既没有找到所谓的误诊的根本原因,也没有阐述由此引起的负面后果。本文通过强调定义的问题,随后与CHIK的混淆以及医生处理登革热样(“登革热”)综合征变异的方式,介绍了登革热临床定义的起源的重建历史。然后,本文根据当前的实践和标准,在这些记录中确定了使重新分类变得复杂的几个因素。这些因素包括用于表征关节问题的术语,记录暴发数据的样式,关节痛的出现频率,可能涉及一种以上药物以及主要媒介物的出现。对这些因素的分析表明,尽管某些旧的“登革热”暴发(包括美洲的1827年至1828年暴发)与CHIK兼容,但由于其他“登革热”暴发的综合原因,很难将其归类为CHIK这些疾病中不存在病理性人格综合征,且背景信息相互矛盾。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号