首页> 外文期刊>Physical Review Physics Education Research >Admissions practices in terminal master’s degree-granting physics departments: A comparative analysis
【24h】

Admissions practices in terminal master’s degree-granting physics departments: A comparative analysis

机译:终端硕士学位授予物理部门的招生实践:比较分析

获取原文
           

摘要

There has been little work done in exploring the variations in admissions practices between different types of physics graduate programs. In this paper, we compared admissions practices in master’s programs to a parallel data set collected from doctoral departments to understand the relative importance of particular admission criteria and looked especially at similar sized and “pressured” programs (as measured by the ratio of applications received-to-intended cohort size). We found that master’s programs experience notably lower application pressure compared to doctoral programs overall. In the prioritization of admission criteria, undergraduate course-taking and undergraduate math and physics GPA received the shared highest priority, while recommendation letters and Graduate Record Examination (GRE) quantitative scores are the next important criteria but are statistically less important for master’s programs in comparison with doctoral programs. In the targeted comparison of similarly sized and pressured master’s and doctoral programs, the higher importance of GRE quantitative scores and the lower importance of prior research considerations in master’s programs persist. We argue that the relatively lower importance placed on the quantitative GRE and physics subject GRE scores enhances the likelihood of success for undergraduates applying to master’s programs, particularly for those who did not take or score well on the quantitative GRE and physics subject GRE test, which have been found to incorporate significant biases against many students but are nonetheless normative in many admissions decisions. The research and graduate level course experiences gained through a master’s program may improve postgraduate job opportunities or even continuation on to doctoral research. However, the shared importance of certain factors in admissions between master’s and doctoral programs risks propagating a systematic inequity.
机译:探索不同类型的物理研究生课程之间的录取实践变化的工作很少。在本文中,我们将硕士课程的招生做法与从博士部门收集的平行数据集进行了比较,以了解特定招生标准的相对重要性,并特别关注了类似规模和“压力大”的课程(以收到的申请的比例来衡量-预期的队列规模)。我们发现,与博士学位课程相比,硕士课程的申请压力明显降低。在优先考虑入学标准时,本科课程和本科数学与物理GPA享有共同的最高优先级,而推荐信和研究生成绩考试(GRE)定量分数是下一个重要标准,但相对于硕士课程而言,统计学上的重要性较低博士课程。在对大小和压力相似的硕士和博士学位课程进行有针对性的比较时,GRE定量分数的重要性越来越高,而硕士课程中先前研究考虑的重要性却一直较低。我们认为,定量GRE和物理学科GRE分数的重要性相对较低,这增加了申请硕士课程的大学生获得成功的可能性,特别是对于那些在定量GRE和物理学科GRE考试中考绩不佳或得分不高的人。已发现对许多学生存在明显的偏见,但在许多招生决定中仍是规范性的。通过硕士课程获得的研究和研究生水平的课程经验可能会增加研究生的工作机会,甚至可以继续进行博士研究。但是,某些因素在硕士和博士学位课程入学方面具有共同的重要性,有可能造成系统性的不平等。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号