...
首页> 外文期刊>Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira >Comparison of two methods of tear sampling for protein quantification by Bradford method
【24h】

Comparison of two methods of tear sampling for protein quantification by Bradford method

机译:用Bradford方法定量蛋白质的两种泪液采样方法的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

The aim of this study was to compare two methods of tear sampling for protein quantification. Tear samples were collected from 29 healthy dogs (58 eyes) using Schirmer tear test (STT) strip and microcapillary tubes. The samples were frozen at -80oC and analyzed by the Bradford method. Results were analyzed by Student's t test. The average protein concentration and standard deviation from tears collected with microcapillary tube were 4.45mg/mL ±0.35 and 4,52mg/mL ±0.29 for right and left eyes respectively. The average protein concentration and standard deviation from tears collected with Schirmer Tear Test (STT) strip were and 54.5mg/mL ±0.63 and 54.15mg/mL ±0.65 to right and left eyes respectively. Statistically significant differences (p
机译:这项研究的目的是比较两种泪液采样方法进行蛋白质定量。使用Schirmer撕裂试验(STT)试纸条和微毛细管从29只健康犬(58只眼)中收集泪液样品。样品在-80oC下冷冻并通过Bradford方法进行分析。通过学生t检验分析结果。右眼和左眼用微毛细管收集的平均蛋白质浓度和眼泪标准偏差分别为4.45mg / mL±0.35和4,52mg / mL±0.29。用Schirmer Tear Test(STT)试纸收集的平均蛋白质浓度和标准偏差(左眼和左眼分别为54.5mg / mL±0.63和54.15mg / mL±0.65)。统计上的显着差异(p

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号