首页> 外文期刊>Pacific Asia journal of the Association for Information Systems >Empirical Analysis of Posts and Interactions: A case of Australian Government Facebook Pages
【24h】

Empirical Analysis of Posts and Interactions: A case of Australian Government Facebook Pages

机译:职位与互动的实证分析:以澳大利亚政府的Facebook专页为例

获取原文
           

摘要

Research on government use of Facebook (FB) and citizen engagement has increased in the last five years or so; however there is a scarcity of empirical research that identify the extent of agency and audience engagement on government FB pages. Questions still remains unanswered if agencies with dissimilar functional focus engage differently in FB. Based on a large-scale world-first empirical analysis of over 147 federal government FB pages, this article presents insights on online participation in terms of government posts and citizen interactions observed over three years (2013-2016) across different types of agencies (i.e. operational, policy, regulatory and specialist). Preliminary findings show convincing agency and audience engagement on FB pages as a platform for sharing and communicating. However there are differences among the agencies in terms of audience and agency engagement relative to post activity and interactions. The findings have implications for federal government agencies, both from benchmarking and capability building perspectives.Available at: http://journal.ecrc.nsysu.edu.tw/index.php/pajais/article/view/382/183
机译:在过去的五年左右的时间里,有关政府使用Facebook(FB)和公民参与的研究有所增加;但是,缺乏确定政府FB页面上代理商和受众参与程度的实证研究。如果职能重心不同的代理商在FB中的参与方式不同,问题仍然没有答案。基于对全球超过147个联邦政府FB页面的大规模首次实证分析,本文根据过去三年(2013-2016年)在不同类型的机构(即,政府职位和公民互动)方面对在线参与的见解运营,政策,法规和专家)。初步调查结果表明,令人信服的机构和受众在FB页面上的参与是共享和交流的平台。但是,相对于后期活动和互动,各机构之间在受众和机构参与方面存在差异。从基准测试和能力建设的角度来看,这些发现对联邦政府机构都有影响。可从以下网址获得:http://journal.ecrc.nsysu.edu.tw/index.php/pajais/article/view/382/183

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号