...
首页> 外文期刊>Pakistan journal of medical sciences. >Comparison between effectiveness of mechanical and manualtraction combined with mobilization and exercise therapyin patients with Cervical Radiculopathy
【24h】

Comparison between effectiveness of mechanical and manualtraction combined with mobilization and exercise therapyin patients with Cervical Radiculopathy

机译:机械和手动牵引结合动员和运动疗法治疗颈神经根病的疗效比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background and Objective: Cervical radiculopathy is a common neuro-musculo-skeletal disorder causing pain and disability. Traction is part of the evidence based manual physical therapy management due to its mechanical nature, type of traction and parameters related to its applicability and are still to be explored more through research. Our objective was to determine the Effects of Mechanical versus Manual Traction in Manual Physical Therapy combined with segmental mobilization and exercise therapy in the physical therapy management of Patients with Cervical Radiculopathy.Methods: This randomized control trial was conducted at department of physical therapy and rehabilitation, Rathore Hospital Faisalabad, from February to July 2015. Inclusion criteria were both male and female patients with evident symptoms of cervical spine radiculopathy and age ranged between 20-70 years. The exclusion criteria were Patients with history of trauma, neck pain without radiculopathy, aged less than 20 and more than 70. A total of 72 patients with cervical radiculopathy were screened out as per the inclusion criteria, 42 patients were randomly selected and placed into two groups by toss and trial method, and only 36 patients completed the study, while 6 dropped out. The mechanical traction was applied in group A and manual traction in group B along with common intervention of segmental mobilization and exercise therapy in both groups for 6 weeks. The patient’s outcomes were assessed by self reported NPRS and NDI at the baseline and after completion of 06 weeks exercise program at 3 days per week. The data was analyzed through SPSS version-21, and paired T test was applied at 95% level significance to determine the statistical deference between two groups.Results: Clinically the group of patients treated with mechanical traction managed pain (mean pre 6.26, mean post 1.43), and disability (mean pre 24.43 and mean post 7.26) more effectively as compared with the group of patients treated with manual traction (Pain mean pre 6.80, mean post 3.85 and disability mean pre 21.92 and post 12.19). Statistically the results of both mechanical and manual traction techniques are equally significant in group A and B for pain and disability (p-value less than 0.05).Conclusion: If patients of cervical radiculopathy treated with mechanical traction, segmental mobilization, and exercise therapy will manage pain and disability more effectively than treated with manual traction, segmental mobilization, and exercise therapy.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.321.8923How to cite this:Bukhari SRI, Shakil-ur-Rehamn S, Ahmad S, Naeem A. Comparison between effectiveness of mechanical and manual traction combined with mobilization and exercise therapy in patients with Cervical Radiculopathy. Pak J Med Sci. 2016;32(1):31-34. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.321.8923This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
机译:背景与目的:颈神经根病是一种常见的神经肌肉骨骼疾病,引起疼痛和残疾。牵引由于其机械性质,牵引类型和与其适用性相关的参数而成为基于手动物理疗法管理的循证医学的一部分,并且有待进一步研究。我们的目的是确定机械牵引与手动牵引在手动物理疗法结合节段动员和运动疗法对宫颈神经根病患者的物理疗法管理中的效果。方法:这项随机对照试验是在物理疗法和康复科进行的,费萨拉巴德Rathore医院,2015年2月至7月。入选标准为男性和女性患者,患有颈椎神经根病的明显症状,年龄在20-70岁之间。排除标准为有创伤史,无神经根病的颈部疼痛,年龄在20岁以下和70岁以上的患者。按照纳入标准筛选出72例颈神经根病患者,随机选择42例患者,分为两部分通过折腾和试验方法进行分组,只有36例患者完成了研究,而6例退出了研究。 A组采用机械牵引,B组采用手动牵引,并在两组中进行节段动员和运动疗法的常规干预,共6周。在基线时以及每周3天完成06周运动计划后,通过自我报告的NPRS和NDI评估患者的结局。数据通过SPSS-21版进行分析,并以95%的显着性进行配对T检验以确定两组之间的统计学差异。结果:临床上接受机械牵引管理的疼痛组患者(平均6.26前,平均术后与手动牵引治疗的患者组(疼痛平均6.80之前,3.85以后的平均值和21.92之前的平均值和12.19之后的残障平均值)相比,残障(平均24.43平均值和7.26平均值)更有效。从统计学上讲,A组和B组在疼痛和残障方面,机械和手动牵引技术的结果均相当显着(p值小于0.05)。结论:如果颈椎神经根病患者采用机械牵引,分段动员和运动疗法治疗,比起手动牵引,节段动员和运动疗法更有效地管理疼痛和残疾。doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.321.8923如何引用此信息:Bukhari SRI,Shakil-ur-Rehamn S ,Ahmad S,Naeem A.颈椎神经根病患者机械和手动牵引结合动员和运动疗法的疗效比较。朴J医学。 2016; 32(1):31-34。 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.321.8923这是根据知识共享署名许可(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0)条款分发的开放访问文章,只要适当引用了原始作品,便可以在任何介质中不受限制地使用,分发和复制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号