...
首页> 外文期刊>Pain research & management: the journal of the Canadian Pain Society = journal de la socie?te? canadienne pour le traitement de la douleur >A Comparison between Enriched and Nonenriched Enrollment Randomized Withdrawal Trials of Opioids for Chronic Noncancer Pain
【24h】

A Comparison between Enriched and Nonenriched Enrollment Randomized Withdrawal Trials of Opioids for Chronic Noncancer Pain

机译:阿片类药物治疗慢性非癌性疼痛的入选与未入选随机对照试验的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

An enriched enrollment randomized withdrawal (EERW) trial design has been advocated to be useful for the study of drugs that are beneficial to only a fraction of the individuals who take them. Some investigators defend the use of enrichment designs for opioids in chronic noncancer pain (CNCP), reasoning that opioids may appear to underperform in clinically heterogeneous contexts, ie, that substantial efficacy in a particular patient subgroup may be diluted or masked by poor efficacy in another subgroup. The authors previously published a systematic review of opioids for CNCP in 2006; however, at that time, there were only a few EERW trials available for comparison. This more exhaustive, updated review compares the results between EERW and non-EERW trials of opioids for a variety of CNCP conditions.
机译:有人主张,应采用丰富的随机招募(EERW)试验设计来研究仅对一小部分服用药物有益的药物。一些研究者反对在慢性非癌性疼痛(CNCP)中使用阿片类药物富集设计,理由是阿片类药物在临床异质情况下可能表现不佳,即特定患者亚组的实质疗效可能被另一种药物的不良功效所稀释或掩盖。亚组。作者先前于2006年发表了有关CNCP阿片类药物的系统评价;但是,当时只有少数EERW试验可供比较。这份更详尽,更新的评论比较了各种CNCP条件下的阿片类药物的EERW和非EERW试验之间的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号