...
首页> 外文期刊>Pain research & management: the journal of the Canadian Pain Society = journal de la socie?te? canadienne pour le traitement de la douleur >Evaluation of the Short- and Long-Term Effectiveness of Pulsed Radiofrequency and Conventional Radiofrequency Performed for Medial Branch Block in Patients with Lumbar Facet Joint Pain
【24h】

Evaluation of the Short- and Long-Term Effectiveness of Pulsed Radiofrequency and Conventional Radiofrequency Performed for Medial Branch Block in Patients with Lumbar Facet Joint Pain

机译:腰椎小关节疼痛患者内侧支传导阻滞的脉冲射频和常规射频的短期和长期疗效评估

获取原文
           

摘要

Background. Diagnosis of lumbar facet joint disease is the sum of the combinations consisting of history, physical activity, and diagnostic imaging frequently including computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging scans. Prevalence of facet-based chronic low back pain is 15–45%. Intra-articular injections with corticosteroid or medial branch block are traditionally used prevalently in the management of chronic low back pain due to lumbar facet joints. However, the evidence levels of these procedures are at either a low or a medium level. Radiofrequency neurolysis of the lumbar medial branch can be used as an alternative in the management of lumbar facet joint pain. There are two types of radiofrequency applications for radiofrequency neurolysis as pulsed radiofrequency and conventional radiofrequency. Materials and Methods. Patients with lumbar facet pain were separated into 2 groups. Group 1 (): patients were given pulsed radiofrequency under fluoroscopy. Group 2 (): patients were given conventional radiofrequency under fluoroscopy. Pre-op and post-op 1st, 3rd, and 6th month and 1st and 2nd year Visual Analogue Scale values of all patients were asked, recorded, and statistically compared. Visual Analogue Scale values of the groups in the same months were compared as well. At the end of the second year, Odom criteria of both groups were recorded and statistically compared. Results. Preoperation Visual Analogue Scale values and postoperation 1st, 3rd, and 6th month and 1st and 2nd year Visual Analogue Scale values were compared in Group 1 and Group 2, and there was a statistically significant difference between preoperation Visual Analogue Scale values and postoperation 1st, 3rd, and 6th month and 1st and 2nd year Visual Analogue Scale values in both groups. However, the number of repetitions of the operation was higher in Group 1. In the comparison of Odom criteria for both groups at the end of the second year, it was observed that the patients in Group 2 were more satisfied with the treatment. Conclusion. Conventional radiofrequency in patients with lumbar facet joint pain for medial branch neurolysis effectively decreases Visual Analogue Scale values in both short and long term. The quality of life and daily activities of patients were better at conventional radiofrequency.
机译:背景。腰椎小关节疾病的诊断是病史,体力活动和诊断成像(包括计算机断层扫描和磁共振成像扫描)组合的总和。基于方面的慢性下腰痛的患病率为15–45%。传统上,皮质类固醇或内侧分支阻滞的关节内注射通常用于治疗由于腰椎小关节引起的慢性下背痛。但是,这些程序的证据级别为低或中等级别。腰椎内侧分支的射频神经溶解可以作为治疗腰椎小关节疼痛的替代方法。射频神经溶解有两种类型的射频应用:脉冲射频和常规射频。材料和方法。腰椎小关节疼痛患者分为两组。第一组():患者在荧光透视下接受脉冲射频治疗。第2组():患者在荧光检查下接受常规射频检查。询问,记录和统计学比较所有患者的手术前和手术后第一,第三和第六个月以及第一和第二年的视觉模拟量表值。还比较了相同月份中各组的视觉模拟量表值。第二年末,记录两组奥多姆标准并进行统计比较。结果。比较第1组和第2组的术前视觉模拟量表值和术后第1、3、6个月以及第1和第2年的视觉模拟量表值,并且术前视觉模拟量表值与术后第1,第3统计学差异,以及两组的第6个月,第1和第2年视觉类比量表的值。但是,第1组的手术重复次数更高。在第二年末对两组的Odom标准进行比较时,观察到第2组的患者对该治疗更为满意。结论。腰椎小关节疼痛的内侧支神经溶解患者的常规射频短期和长期均可有效降低视觉模拟量表值。常规射频能改善患者的生活质量和日常活动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号