首页> 外文期刊>Systematic Reviews >Searching and synthesising ‘grey literature’ and ‘grey information’ in public health: critical reflections on three case studies
【24h】

Searching and synthesising ‘grey literature’ and ‘grey information’ in public health: critical reflections on three case studies

机译:在公共卫生中搜索和综合“灰色文献”和“灰色信息”:对三个案例研究的批判性思考

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Grey literature includes a range of documents not controlled by commercial publishing organisations. This means that grey literature can be difficult to search and retrieve for evidence synthesis. Much knowledge and evidence in public health, and other fields, accumulates from innovation in practice. This knowledge may not even be of sufficient formality to meet the definition of grey literature. We term this knowledge ‘grey information’. Grey information may be even harder to search for and retrieve than grey literature. Methods On three previous occasions, we have attempted to systematically search for and synthesise public health grey literature and information—both to summarise the extent and nature of particular classes of interventions and to synthesise results of evaluations. Here, we briefly describe these three ‘case studies’ but focus on our post hoc critical reflections on searching for and synthesising grey literature and information garnered from our experiences of these case studies. We believe these reflections will be useful to future researchers working in this area. Results Issues discussed include search methods, searching efficiency, replicability of searches, data management, data extraction, assessing study ‘quality’, data synthesis, time and resources, and differentiating evidence synthesis from primary research. Conclusions Information on applied public health research questions relating to the nature and range of public health interventions, as well as many evaluations of these interventions, may be predominantly, or only, held in grey literature and grey information. Evidence syntheses on these topics need, therefore, to embrace grey literature and information. Many typical systematic review methods for searching, appraising, managing, and synthesising the evidence base can be adapted for use with grey literature and information. Evidence synthesisers should carefully consider the opportunities and problems offered by including grey literature and information. Enhanced incentives for accurate recording and further methodological developments in retrieval will facilitate future syntheses of grey literature and information.
机译:背景技术灰色文献包括一系列不受商业出版机构控制的文件。这意味着灰色文献可能难以搜索和检索以进行证据综合。实践中的创新积累了许多公共卫生和其他领域的知识和证据。这种知识甚至可能还不够形式化,无法满足灰色文献的定义。我们将此知识称为“灰色信息”。灰色信息可能比灰色文献更难搜索和检索。方法在过去的三个场合中,我们试图系统地搜索和综合公共卫生灰色文献和信息,以总结特定类别干预措施的范围和性质,并综合评估结果。在这里,我们简要描述了这三个“案例研究”,但重点是针对我们在这些案例研究的经验中寻找和综合灰色文献和信息的事后批判性反思。我们认为,这些思考将对未来从事该领域的研究人员有用。结果讨论的问题包括搜索方法,搜索效率,搜索的可复制性,数据管理,数据提取,评估研究的“质量”,数据合成,时间和资源以及将证据合成与基础研究区分开。结论关于与公共卫生干预措施的性质和范围有关的应用公共卫生研究问题的信息,以及对这些干预措施的许多评估,可能主要或仅在灰色文献和灰色信息中保存。因此,关于这些主题的证据综合需要包含灰色文献和信息。用于搜索,评估,管理和综合证据基础的许多典型的系统审查方法都可以适用于灰色文献和信息。证据综合人员应仔细考虑包括灰色文献和信息在内的机遇和问题。加强激励以促进准确记录和进一步的检索方法发展,将有助于将来灰色文献和信息的综合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号