...
首页> 外文期刊>Sustainability >Teachers’ Competencies for the Implementation of Educational Offers in the Field of Education for Sustainable Development
【24h】

Teachers’ Competencies for the Implementation of Educational Offers in the Field of Education for Sustainable Development

机译:教师在可持续发展教育领域中实施教育优惠的能力

获取原文
           

摘要

The term of education is an integral part of any programmatic political document on sustainable development. This fact underlines the significance that is assigned to education in the context of sustainable development. It leads to the question of what competencies teachers need in order to develop and implement educational offers in the field of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) so that they can aspire to and attain specific educational goals with their students. This touches on the question of the building of corresponding competencies in teacher education and further education. So far, few attempts have been made to describe teachers’ competencies regarding ESD and to develop corresponding competence models. The following article presents two models—Curriculum, Sustainable Development, Competences, Teacher Training (CSCT Model) and Learning for the future: The Competences in Education for Sustainable Development (ECE Model)—and discusses their benefit for teacher education and further education. These models differ in how broadly they define ESD and in what audiences they target at. This comparison shows and explains why competence models should focus on profession-specific core competencies if they are to be used as a basis for the conception of educational offers in the field of ESD in education and further education of teachers. The drawn conclusion consists in initial considerations for the conception of another competence model.
机译:教育术语是任何有关可持续发展的纲领性政治文件的组成部分。这一事实强调了在可持续发展的背景下赋予教育的重要性。这就提出了一个问题,即教师在发展和实施可持续发展教育(ESD)领域中需要哪些能力才能使他们能够向学生追求并实现特定的教育目标。这触及了在教师教育和继续教育中建立相应能力的问题。到目前为止,几乎没有尝试描述教师在ESD方面的能力并开发相应的能力模型。下面的文章介绍了两个模型:课程,可持续发展,能力,教师培训(CSCT模型)和面向未来的学习:可持续发展教育的能力(ECE模型),并讨论了它们对教师教育和继续教育的好处。这些模型在定义ESD的范围和目标受众方面有所不同。这种比较表明并解释了,如果将胜任力模型用作教育,教师继续教育领域的可持续发展教育概念的基础,那么为什么胜任力模型应着重于特定于专业的核心胜任力。得出的结论包括对其他能力模型概念的初步考虑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号