首页> 外文期刊>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy >Evaluation of the psychometric properties of self-reported measures of alcohol consumption: a COSMIN systematic review
【24h】

Evaluation of the psychometric properties of self-reported measures of alcohol consumption: a COSMIN systematic review

机译:自我报告的饮酒量度的心理计量学特性评估:COSMIN系统评价

获取原文
           

摘要

To review studies about the reliability and validity of self-reported alcohol consumption measures among adults, an area which needs updating to reflect current research. Databases (PUBMED (1966-present), MEDLINE (1946-present), EMBASE (1947-present), Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) (1937-present), PsycINFO (1887-present) and Social Science Citation Index (1976-present)) were searched systematically for studies from inception to 11th August 2017. Pairs of independent reviewers screened study titles, abstracts and full texts with high agreement and a third author resolved disagreements. A comprehensive quality assessment was conducted of the reported psychometric properties of measures of alcohol consumption using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) to derive ratings of poor, fair, good or excellent for each checklist item relating to each psychometric property. Twenty-eight studies met inclusion criteria and, collectively, they investigated twenty-one short-term recall measures, fourteen quantity-frequency measures and eleven graduated-frequency measures. All measures demonstrated adequate/good test-retest reliability and convergent validity. Quantity-frequency measures demonstrated adequate/good criterion validity; graduated-frequency and short-term recall measures demonstrated adequate/good divergent validity. Quantity-frequency measures and short-term recall measures demonstrated adequate/good hypothesis validity; short-term recall measures demonstrated adequate construct validity. Methodological quality varied within and between studies. It was difficult to discern conclusively which measure was the most reliable and valid given that no study assessed all psychometric properties and the included studies varied in the psychometric properties that they selected to assess. However, when the results from the range of studies were considered and summed, they tended to indicate that the quantity-frequency measure compared to the other two measures performed best in psychometric terms and, therefore, it is likely to produce the most reliable and valid assessment of alcohol consumption in population surveys.
机译:回顾关于自我报告的成年人饮酒措施的可靠性和有效性的研究,该领域需要更新以反映当前的研究。数据库(PUBMED(1966年至今),MEDLINE(1946年至今),EMBASE(1947年至今),护理和相关健康文献累积索引(CINAHL)(1937年至今),PsycINFO(1887年至今)和社会科学引文从开始到2017年8月11日,系统地检索了索引(1976年至今)以进行研究。成对的独立审稿人以很高的同意筛选了研究标题,摘要和全文,第三位作者解决了分歧。使用基于COnsensus的健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)对所报告的饮酒量度的心理计量学特性进行了全面的质量评估,以得出与每个清单相关的每个清单项目的差,中,好或极等等级心理测量属性。 28项研究符合纳入标准,并共同研究了21项短期召回措施,14项数量频率措施和11项分级频率措施。所有措施均显示出足够/良好的重测信度和收敛效度。数量-频率措施显示出充分/良好的标准有效性;频次和短期召回措施显示出适当/良好的不同有效性。数量-频率测量和短期召回测量显示出足够/良好的假设有效性;短期召回措施显示出足够的结构效度。在研究之内和之间,方法学的质量各不相同。鉴于没有研究评估所有心理计量学特性,并且所纳入的研究在他们选择评估的心理计量学特性方面存在差异,因此很难下结论性地确定哪种方法最可靠,最有效。但是,当考虑和汇总研究范围的结果时,他们倾向于表明,与其他两种测量相比,数量-频率测量在心理计量学方面表现最佳,因此,它可能会产生最可靠,最有效的方法。在人口调查中评估饮酒量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号