首页> 外文期刊>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy >Difference in long-term relapse rates between youths with ketamine use and those with stimulants use
【24h】

Difference in long-term relapse rates between youths with ketamine use and those with stimulants use

机译:使用氯胺酮的年轻人和使用兴奋剂的年轻人之间长期复发率的差异

获取原文
           

摘要

Understanding the relapse risk among different illicit drugs is vital for developing an adequate relapse prevention policy. Therefore, the current study aims to explore the potential difference in long-term relapse rates between youths who use ketamine and those who use stimulants (3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine [MDMA] or methamphetamine). The study’s participants included 92 youths with ketamine use (ketamine group, mean age: 16.0?years) and 43 youths with MDMA/methamphetamine use (stimulants group, mean age: 16.1?years) that had undergone a family-oriented treatment program in a medical center in Taiwan. All participants were followed up for a maximum of 7 years in order to observe their long-term outcomes with regard to substance use relapse. During the follow-up period, compared to the 34.8% relapse rate in ketamine users, their counterparts who used MDMA or methamphetamine had a significantly higher relapse rate (60.5%, Adjusted HR?=?1.86, 95%CI: 1.06–3.28, p?=?0.032). Of the youths in the ketamine group that relapsed, 65.6% continued to use ketamine in their relapse event, while 34.4% switched to MDMA or methamphetamine. Among the relapsing youths in the stimulants group, 84.6% continued to use MDMA or methamphetamine in their relapse event, while 15.4% switched to ketamine (p?=?0.042). Compared to adolescents who use ketamine, those using MDMA or methamphetamine had higher relapse rates and were more likely to use the same type of drug upon relapsing. These results can serve as a crucial reference for developing relapse prevention policies of illicit drugs for the youth population.
机译:了解不同非法药物之间的复发风险对于制定适当的预防复发政策至关重要。因此,本研究旨在探讨使用氯胺酮的年轻人和使用兴奋剂(3,4-亚甲基二氧甲基苯丙胺[MDMA]或甲基苯丙胺)的年轻人之间长期复发率的潜在差异。该研究的参与者包括92位使用氯胺酮的年轻人(氯胺酮组,平均年龄:16.0岁)和43位使用MDMA /甲基苯丙胺的年轻人(兴奋剂组,平均年龄:16.1岁),他们在一家医院接受了家庭治疗。台湾医疗中心。对所有参与者进行最长7年的随访,以观察他们在药物使用复发方面的长期结果。在随访期间,与氯胺酮使用者的34.8%复发率相比,使用MDMA或甲基苯丙胺的对应者的复发率显着更高(60.5%,调整后的HR?= 1.86,95%CI:1.06-3.28, p≥0.032)。在氯胺酮组复发的年轻人中,有65.6%的人在复发事件中继续使用氯胺酮,而34.4%的人改用MDMA或甲基苯丙胺。在兴奋剂组中复发的年轻人中,有84.6%的人在复发事件中继续使用MDMA或甲基苯丙胺,而15.4%的人改用氯胺酮(p?=?0.042)。与使用氯胺酮的青少年相比,使用摇头丸或甲基苯丙胺的青少年复发率更高,复发后更可能使用相同类型的药物。这些结果可为制定针对年轻人口的非法药物预防复发政策提供重要参考。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号