首页> 外文期刊>Stem Cell >Endoscopic Band Ligation versus Argon Plasma Coagulation in Treatment of Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia
【24h】

Endoscopic Band Ligation versus Argon Plasma Coagulation in Treatment of Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia

机译:内镜带结扎术与氩血浆凝结术治疗胃窦血管性扩张症

获取原文
       

摘要

Objective: To evaluate the therapeutic effects of endoscopic band ligation (EBL) as a modality for the treatment of bleeding from gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) in comparison to argon plasma coagulation (APC) in Egyptian patients. Background: Argon Plasma Coagulation (APC) is considered the standard commonly used treatment for Gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE). Recently, the use of banding in the gastric antrum has been evaluated for the treatment of GAVE. Methods: The study was conducted on thirty patients presenting with bleeding from GAVE. The patients were divided into two groups: Group I (EBL) group: 15 patients were subjected to EBL. Group II (APC) group: 15 patients were subjected to APC. Sessions were done every 3 weeks till satisfactory endoscopic ablation was achieved. Regular endoscopic assessment at 3 months was done with documentation of the recurrence of GAVE if found. Results revealed that thirteen patients were males and seventeen were females with age ranging from 51-70 years old. Most of the patients presented with overt bleeding (hematemesis and/or melena) (67%) in the APC group and (67%) in the EBL group. In endoscopic band ligation group, all patients (100%) showed complete improvement with no upper gastrointestinal endoscopic recurrence. In APC 10 patients, (67%) showed complete improvement with no upper gastrointestinal endoscopic recurrence, 5 patients (33 %) showed no upper gastrointestinal endoscopic improvement. In conclusion , EBL is a better treatment modality for GAVE than APC.
机译:目的:评价与内镜下结扎术(EBL)相比,埃及人血浆氩气凝结术(APC)治疗胃窦血管扩张(GAVE)出血的疗效。背景:氩气血浆凝结(APC)被认为是胃窦性血管扩张(GAVE)常用的标准治疗方法。最近,已经评估了在胃窦中使用束带治疗GAVE。方法:本研究针对30例GAVE出血患者进行。将患者分为两组:第一组(EBL)组:15名患者接受了EBL。第二组(APC)组:15例患者接受了APC。每3周进行一次会议,直到获得令人满意的内镜消融。如果发现GAVE复发,则在3个月时定期进行内镜评估。结果显示,男13例,女17例,年龄51-70岁。在APC组中,大多数患者表现为明显的出血(呕血和/或黑便)(67%),在EBL组中表现为(67%)。内镜下结扎组所有患者(100%)均显示完全好转,无上消化道内镜复发。在APC中有10例患者(67%)表现出完全改善,无上消化道内镜复发,有5例患者(33%)没有表现出上消化道内镜改善。总之,与APC相比,EBL是一种更好的GAVE治疗方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号