...
首页> 外文期刊>South African Journal of Physiotherapy >Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of six musculoskeletal preparticipatory screening tests
【24h】

Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of six musculoskeletal preparticipatory screening tests

机译:六个肌肉骨骼参与性筛查试验的评定者内和评定者间可靠性

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: ?High injury prevalence rates call for effective sports injury prevention strategies, which include the development and application of practical and reliable pre-participatory screening tools. Objectives: ?The aim of this study was to investigate the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the one-legged hyperextension test (1LHET), the empty can (EC) and full can (FC) tests, the standing stork test (SST), the bridge-hold test (BHT) and the 747 balance test (747BT). Method: ?Thirty-five healthy, injury-free male athletes (cricket and soccer players), aged 16–24 years, were evaluated by two physiotherapists. For each of the tests, the participants were evaluated twice (on two consecutive days) by each physiotherapist. Both the intra- and inter-rater reliability were determined. Cohen’s kappa ( k ) was calculated for the 1LHET, the EC and FC tests and the SST. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used for the BHT and the 747BT. A confidence level of 95% ( p ?≤ 0.05) was applied as the criterion for determining the statistical significance of the results. Results: ?The SST presented with the lowest level of intra-rater agreement (ICC = –0.20 to 0.10). On the other hand, the EC test was the only test where one rater achieved an excellent intersessional agreement ( k ?= 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40–1.20). Substantial to excellent results for the inter-rater agreement for both sessions were recorded for the 1LHET ( k ?= 0.70–0.90) and the BHT (ICC = 0.70–0.90). Conclusion: ?Reliability values need to be considered when making clinical decisions based on screening tests. A more refined description of the testing procedures and criteria for interpretation might be necessary before including the six screening tests investigated in this study in formal screening protocols. Clinical implication: ?Confirmed reliability of screening tests would enable sports professionals to make informed decisions when designing preparticipatory musculoskeletal screening tools and when dealing with the management of injury risks in athletes.
机译:背景:?高受伤率要求采取有效的运动损伤预防策略,其中包括开发和应用实用且可靠的参与前筛查工具。目的:这项研究的目的是调查单腿超伸试验(1LHET),空罐(EC)和满罐(FC)试验,站立式鹳试验( SST),桥接保持测试(BHT)和747平衡测试(747BT)。方法:?由两名物理治疗师评估了35名16-24岁的健康,无伤害的男运动员(板球和足球运动员)。对于每个测试,每个理疗师对参与者进行两次评估(连续两天)。评估者内部和评估者之间的可靠性都得到了确定。科恩的kappa(k)是针对1LHET,EC和FC测试以及SST计算得出的。组内相关系数(ICC)用于BHT和747BT。 95%的置信度(p≤0.05)被用作确定结果的统计显着性的标准。结果:?SST的评级人内部协议水平最低(ICC = –0.20至0.10)。另一方面,EC测试是唯一的一个评估者达到了极好的闭会期间一致性的测试(k = 0.80; 95%置信区间[CI]为0.40-1.20)。两次会议的评分者间协议均取得了相当不错的成绩,记录了1LHET(k = 0.70-0.90)和BHT(ICC = 0.70-0.90)。结论:在基于筛查测试做出临床决策时,需要考虑可靠性值。在正式筛查方案中纳入本研究中研究的六种筛查测试之前,可能需要对测试程序和解释标准进行更精细的描述。临床意义:?确认筛查测试的可靠性将使体育专业人士在设计参与性肌肉骨骼筛查工具时以及在处理运动员受伤风险的管理时做出明智的决定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号