...
首页> 外文期刊>Sokoto Journal of Veterinary Sciences >Cost-effectiveness of pin-in-fibreglass cast versus Kirschner-Ehmer type I external skeletal fixator in the management of transverse radius-ulna fractures in dogs
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness of pin-in-fibreglass cast versus Kirschner-Ehmer type I external skeletal fixator in the management of transverse radius-ulna fractures in dogs

机译:针刺玻璃纤维石膏与Kirschner-Ehmer I型骨外固定架在犬横radius尺骨骨折治疗中的成本效益

获取原文
           

摘要

The cost of medical care is an important issue all over the world. With worsening global economy and the poverty inherent in low earning economies in the third world countries, economic considerations have always remained a major determinant factor in the choice of treatment. In this study, the cost-effectiveness of pin-in-fibreglass cast fixator (PFCF) was comparatively evaluated against a commercially available fixator (Kirschner-Ehmer type I external fixator) (KESF) in the management of induced closed transverse mid-shaft radius-ulna fractures in dogs. Four adult (2 males and 2 females) dogs with closed transverse mid-shaft radius-ulna fractures were used for this study. These dogs were randomly assigned to two groups (A and B) with each group made up of two dogs. Radius-ulna fractures were created in all the dogs under injectable anaesthesia as follows: Group A; PFCF, and Group B; KESF. A cost analysis was performed using the duration of operative and post-operative procedures, duration of morbidity period, direct and indirect labour cost, and cost of dog-hour lost during the morbidity period as economic indices. The overall duration of the operative and the entire post-operative procedures were 5.5±0.14 and 22±0.21 hours (1:4.4) for PFCF and KESF (P>0.05) respectively. The morbidity period was 9 and 8 weeks for PFCF and KESF respectively. The average cost of medical care (in 2015 $1 US ≈ N198 Nigerian Naira) was $81.8 and $294 (1:3.6) for PFCF and KESF respectively. The cost benefit analysis based on the economic loss due to dog-hour lost during the morbidity period were $990. 9 and $1103 (1:1.1) for PFCF and KESF respectively. In conclusion, PFCF is faster and easier to perform, and more economical than the KESF technique despite the longer morbidity period associated with it. This is accounted for by the lower cost of fixative and hospital charges.
机译:医疗费用是全世界的重要问题。随着全球经济的恶化和第三世界国家低收入经济体固有的贫困,经济因素一直是选择治疗方法的主要决定因素。在这项研究中,对比玻璃纤维销钉固定器(PFCF)与市售固定器(Kirschner-Ehmer I型外固定器)(KESF)在诱导闭合横轴中轴半径管理中的成本效益-狗的尺骨骨折。本研究使用了四只成年犬(2例雄性和2例雌性),它们具有闭合的横中轴radius尺骨骨折。将这些狗随机分为两组(A和B),每组由两只狗组成。如下所示,在所有注射麻醉的狗中都产生了尺骨ul骨骨折。 PFCF和B组; KESF。使用手术和术后程序的持续时间,发病期间的持续时间,直接和间接人工成本以及发病期间损失的工时成本作为经济指标进行了成本分析。 PFCF和KESF的总手术时间为5.5±0.14小时,整个手术后为22±0.21小时(1:4.4)(P> 0.05)。 PFCF和KESF的发病期分别为9周和8周。 PFCF和KESF的平均医疗费用(2015年为$ 1 US≈N198尼日利亚奈拉)分别为$ 81.8和$ 294(1:3.6)。基于发病期间损失工时的经济损失,成本效益分析为990美元。 PFCF和KESF分别为9和$ 1103(1:1.1)。总之,尽管PFCF的发病期更长,但它比KESF技术更快,更容易执行,并且更经济。这是由于固定剂和医院费用较低的原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号