首页> 外文期刊>Sociology Mind >The Politics of Data:Uncovering Whiteness in Conventional Social Policy and Social Work Research
【24h】

The Politics of Data:Uncovering Whiteness in Conventional Social Policy and Social Work Research

机译:数据政治:传统社会政策和社会工作研究中的空白

获取原文
       

摘要

The implementation of a robust community based participatory research (CBPR) study in Multnomah County, Oregon, has detailed broad and deep racial disparities across 27 institutions and systems. The process of this research has led to the identification of numerous practices that misrepresent and negate the experiences and very identity of communities of color. The research draws from engagement with numerous databases from the Census Bureau, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, and various administrative databases. The core issues at hand are population undercounts, understudy of the unique characteristics of these communities, inaccuracies in how data are codified and analyzed, and data collection efforts that are infused with white centrism and a colorblindness that renders issues minimized and the experiences of communities of color obscured. Collectively, we analyze this experience to suggest that much conventional policy research while wrapped in a cloak of objectivity is in fact a reproduction of whiteness that renders communities of color invisible, marginalized and misunderstood. The impact of these practices is to extend whiteness into the arena of policy research, and correspondingly extend dynamics of oppression and white centrism. The paper profiles each area of the policy research process that reflects and reinscribes whiteness and concludes with an articulation the reach of such conventional practice and outlines an avenue to reduce the influence of whiteness.
机译:在俄勒冈州摩特诺玛县实施的一项强有力的基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)研究,详细描述了27个机构和系统中广泛而深刻的种族差异。这项研究的过程导致发现了许多错误地描述和否定色彩社区的经历和身份的做法。该研究来自与人口普查局,劳工统计局,药物滥用和精神卫生服务管理局以及各种行政数据库的众多数据库的合作。当前的核心问题是人口不足,对这些社区的独特特征的研究,对数据进行编纂和分析的方式不准确,以及注入了白人中心主义和色盲的数据收集工作,从而使问题降至最低程度以及社区的经验颜色模糊。总的来说,我们分析这种经验表明,许多传统的政策研究虽然笼罩在客观性中,但实际上是对白色的再现,使颜色社区变得不可见,被边缘化和被误解​​了。这些做法的影响是将白人带入政策研究领域,并相应地扩大了压迫和白人中心主义的动力。本文概述了反映和重新定义白度的政策研究过程的每个领域,并明确阐述了这种传统做法的适用范围,并概述了减少白度影响的途径。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号