首页> 外文期刊>Sociology Mind >When Corporal Acts Are Labeled Criminal: Lack of Privacy among the Homeless
【24h】

When Corporal Acts Are Labeled Criminal: Lack of Privacy among the Homeless

机译:当体罚被标记为犯罪时:无家可归者缺乏隐私

获取原文
       

摘要

This paper concerns homelessness and its strained relation to personal privacy. The homeless, by and large, have no access to truly private spaces they can lay legitimate claim to—places where they will not be potentially harassed or seen by the public or the police. In this paper, I illustrate some of the experiences the homeless have had while lacking privacy, the ways they adjust to and cope with the loss of privacy, and their attempts to find privacy, however temporarily. In addition, the relations between legality and homeless living are explored alongside some discussion of the homeless shelter system and how people that have stayed in shelters often view it. The methodology implemented in the study involved face-to-face contact and the use of a semi-structured instrument of interview questions concerning the lived experiences encountered by homeless individuals living on the streets in Anaheim and Fullerton in southern California. The direct evidence from the study suggests that many homeless individuals have their reasons for disliking homeless shelters, that their public experiences are inevitably trying and uncomfortable, and that public and police surveillance of their daily activities pose a sort of omnipresent threat to their privacy, possessions and even their bodies. And this threat is of a kind that they have minimal, if any, means to circumvent. I conclude with an examination of the kind of policy—Housing First—that is the best social tool we collectively have, so far, for reducing the number of actively homeless persons.
机译:本文涉及无家可归及其与个人隐私的紧张关系。总体而言,这些无家可归者无路可走,他们可以提出合法要求的真正私人空间-在这些地方,公众或警察不会对他们进行骚扰或看到。在本文中,我将举例说明无家可归者在缺乏隐私的情况下所经历的一些经历,他们如何适应和应对隐私的丧失以及他们试图找到隐私的尝试,但是只是暂时的。此外,还探讨了合法性与无家可归者生活之间的关系,以及对无家可归者收容所系统以及留在收容所中的人们如何经常看待它的一些讨论。该研究中采用的方法包括面对面接触和使用半结构化访谈工具,这些问题涉及在加利福尼亚南部阿纳海姆和富勒顿街头无家可归者所遇到的生活经历。该研究的直接证据表明,许多无家可归者有其厌恶无家可归者庇护所的原因,他们的公共经历不可避免地在尝试和感到不适,公众和警察对其日常活动的监视对他们的隐私,财产构成了无所不在的威胁。甚至他们的身体。这种威胁是他们几乎没有(即使有)手段来规避的威胁。最后,我将探讨一种政策,即“住房优先”,这是迄今为止我们集体为减少主动无家可归者的人数而拥有的最佳社会工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号