...
首页> 外文期刊>Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia >An observational study of perioperative antibiotic-prophylaxis use at a major quaternary care and referral hospital in Saudi Arabia
【24h】

An observational study of perioperative antibiotic-prophylaxis use at a major quaternary care and referral hospital in Saudi Arabia

机译:沙特阿拉伯一家大型四级护理和转诊医院围手术期预防性使用抗生素的观察性研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Context: The use of perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis has been consistently considered an effective means of reducing the risk of surgical site infections. However, inappropriate use of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis is associated with complications such as reduced treatment efficacy, development of antibiotic resistance, and increased health-care costs. Aims: The aim of this study is to investigate the adherence to internationalational guidelines regarding the use of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in the perioperative period. Settings and Design: King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre (KFSH&RC) a 1589-bed tertiary/quaternary care and referral hospital based in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Subjects and Methods: A retrospective observational study, in which antibiotic prophylaxis parameters were assessed against recommendations provided by internationalational guidelines in elective/emergency procedures performed at the general operating suite. Data was obtained from the medical records starting of 174 cases over a period of 2 weeks in May 2016. Results: Preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) was prescribed for 118 (78.7%) patients, 72 (61%) of which were “recommended,” whereas 46 (39%) were “not recommended.” Of the 72 patients for whom the antibiotics were “recommended” and given, 19 (26.4%) received “inadequate” choice of antibiotics, 50 (69.4%) received a sub-therapeutic dose, 14 (19.4%) had “improper” timing of the first dose, 11 (15.3%) were given an “inappropriate” second intraoperative dose, and 43 (59.7%) had an unnecessarily extended duration of prophylaxis. The overall compliance to guidelines was achieved in only 23 (15.3%) patients. Conclusions: A significant gap between current KFSH & RC practice and internationalational guidelines regarding surgical antibiotic prophylaxis usage has been demonstrated which calls for immediate action to ensure effective guideline adoption and implementation.
机译:背景:围手术期使用抗菌药物一直被认为是减少手术部位感染风险的有效手段。但是,不适当地使用外科手术抗生素预防会引起并发症,例如治疗功效降低,抗生素耐药性的发展以及医疗费用的增加。目的:本研究的目的是调查围手术期对使用外科手术抗生素进行预防的国际/国内指导原则。设置和设计:费萨尔国王专科医院和研究中心(KFSH&RC),位于沙特阿拉伯利雅得的拥有1589张病床的三级/四级护理和转诊医院。受试者与方法:一项回顾性观察性研究,其中抗生素预防参数根据国际/国家指南在一般操作套件中进行的选择性/急诊程序提供的建议进行评估。从2016年5月开始的为期2周的174例患者的病历中获取数据。结果:118例患者(78.7%)接受了术前抗生素预防(PAP)处方,其中“推荐(72%),(61%)” ”,而“不推荐”的比例为46(占39%)。在“推荐”并给予抗生素的72例患者中,有19例(26.4%)接受了“不适当”的抗生素选择,其中50例(69.4%)接受了亚治疗剂量,14例(19.4%)的时机“不正确”在第一个剂量中,有11个(15.3%)给予了“不合适的”第二次术中剂量,有43个(59.7%)的预防时间延长了。仅23例(15.3%)患者达到了指南的总体依从性。结论:目前的KFSH和RC做法与有关预防性使用外科手术抗生素的国际/国家准则之间存在巨大差距,这要求立即采取行动以确保有效地采用和实施准则。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号