首页> 外文期刊>Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia >Comparative study of anatomical landmark-guided versus ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve block in chronic shoulder pain
【24h】

Comparative study of anatomical landmark-guided versus ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve block in chronic shoulder pain

机译:解剖学界标引导与超声引导肩cap上神经阻滞在慢性肩痛中的比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) is an effective method for the treatment of shoulder disorders. The present study was conducted to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of SSNB under ultrasonographic guidance with anatomical landmark-guided (LMG) technique in the treatment of chronic shoulder pain. Materials and Methods: A total of fifty patients with shoulder pain were enrolled in the present prospective randomized study. Patients in Group I ( n = 25) received SSNB using the anatomical LMG as technique described by Dangoisse, in whom a total of 6 ml of drug (5 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine and 40 mg methylprednisolone) was injected. Group II patients ( n = 25) were given SSNB using the ultrasound guidance with the same amount of drug. Pain was measured using visual analog scale (VAS), range of motion and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) were recorded. Observations were recorded before the block, immediately after the block, and 1 and 4 weeks after the block. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the VAS score, range of motion and SPADI before the procedure ( P > 0.05) in both the groups. Both the groups showed statistically similar improvement of VAS, range of motion and SPADI at 4-week ( P > 0.05) follow-up. In Group I, VAS decreased from baseline value of 6.64 ± 1.50–2.04 ± 0.94 at 4 weeks ( P < 0.001). In Group II, the VAS decreased from 6.92 ± 1.00 to 1.84 ± 1.03 at 4 weeks ( P < 0.01). Conclusion: In our study, both the techniques have produced comparable relief of pain, improvement in shoulder movement, and decreased SPADI 4 weeks after the block.
机译:背景:肩cap上神经阻滞(SSNB)是治疗肩部疾病的有效方法。本研究旨在评估和比较超声引导下SSNB与解剖学界标引导(LMG)技术在慢性肩痛治疗中的有效性。材料和方法:本前瞻性随机研究共纳入50例肩痛患者。第一组(n = 25)的患者采用Dangoisse所述的解剖学LMG方法接受SSNB,其中总共注射了6 ml的药物(5 ml的0.25%布比卡因和40 mg甲基强的松龙)。 II组患者(n = 25)在超声引导下使用相同剂量的药物给予SSNB。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量疼痛,记录运动范围并记录肩痛和残疾指数(SPADI)。在阻滞前,阻滞后,阻滞后1和4周记录观察结果。结果:两组患者手术前的VAS评分,运动范围和SPADI之间无统计学差异(P> 0.05)。两组在第4周的随访中均显示出VAS,运动范围和SPADI的统计学改善(P> 0.05)。在第一组,VAS在4周时从基线值6.64±1.50–2.04±0.94下降(P <0.001)。在第二组,VAS在4周时从6.92±1.00下降至1.84±1.03(P <0.01)。结论:在我们的研究中,这两种技术均能在阻滞后4周产生类似的疼痛缓解,肩部运动改善和SPADI降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号