...
首页> 外文期刊>SAGE Open >Analysis of Texts in the Field of Education: A Regulation on Textbook Approval and a History Textbook
【24h】

Analysis of Texts in the Field of Education: A Regulation on Textbook Approval and a History Textbook

机译:教育领域的文本分析:教科书批准条例和历史教科书

获取原文
           

摘要

The educational discourse is one of the primary places where numerous dominant ideological premises are established. These discursive constructions are usually not expressed explicitly but are tacit or covered. In other words, ideological premises are not conveyed via ideational (dictionary) meaning of utterances. The analysis therefore has to tackle not the grammatical or logical layer of the text but has to look into the pragmatic aspect of discourse or text in the social communication. In this way, Grice developed his idea of cooperative principle in the analysis of pragmatic rules (maxims) that speakers use in head-to-head interactions to make themselves understood. The violation of those rules usually means that the speaker is making a a??conversationala?? implicature, that is, an implication that cannot be inferred from his spoken contribution but assumes some common knowledge or presupposition. Conversational implicatures are therefore the places where ideological presuppositions can be detected. Gricea??s maxims are used in the analysis of two distinct types of texts in the field of educationa??a regulation on textbook approval and a history textbook. In both texts, Gricea??s principles are used to uncover ideological premises.
机译:教育话语是建立众多主导思想前提的主要场所之一。这些话语结构通常没有明确表达,但是是默认的或涵盖的。换句话说,意识形态前提不是通过话语的概念性(字典性)传达的。因此,分析不必处理文本的语法或逻辑层面,而必须研究社会交际中话语或文本的实用方面。通过这种方式,格赖斯在分析说话者在头对头互动中使用的实用规则(准则)时发展了他的合作原则概念,以使自己理解。违反这些规则通常意味着演讲者正在进行“对话”。暗示,即一种暗示,不能从他的口头贡献中推断出来,而是具有一些常识或预设。因此,会话含义是可以检测到意识形态预设的地方。 Gricea的格言用于分析教育领域中两种不同类型的文本-教科书批准法规和历史教科书。在这两本书中,格里塞亚的原理都被用来揭示意识形态的前提。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号