...
首页> 外文期刊>Safety Science Monitor >The Effects of Changing Patterns of Employment on Reporting Occupational Injuries and Making Worker' Compensation Claims
【24h】

The Effects of Changing Patterns of Employment on Reporting Occupational Injuries and Making Worker' Compensation Claims

机译:就业方式的变化对报告工伤和提出工伤索赔的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

In the past 20 years there has been a significant growth in those working in self-employment, inmicro small businesses, or under casual, part-time, subcontract, franchised, telework or homeworkingarrangements in Australia. These employment status groups are now commonly known as precarious workers;principally because their continued employment and income is uncertain. The available research indicates thatthe probability of a work-related injury is greater for precarious workers. This paper focuses on the extent towhich precariously employed Australian workers formally report their work-related injuries and illnesses andclaim workers’ compensation.While Australia has comprehensive – although fragmented – workers’ compensation insurance systems, thisformal coverage does not correlate with the propensity to make workers’ compensation claims. Findings froma series of Australian precarious worker studies are summarised in this paper and a detailed analysis ofworkers’ compensation claims experiences from our latest research project on long distance truck drivers ispresented. We argue that even those precarious workers covered by workers’ compensation insurance are lesslikely to claim than other workers for two key reasons: uncertainty of coverage and fear of consequences if aclaim is made. Thus injured precarious workers are more reliant on their own resources after injury, toexternalise injury treatment costs onto taxpayer funded resources, or to leave injuries and illness untreated witha potential to develop into chronic conditions.
机译:在过去的20年中,在澳大利亚从事自营职业,微型微型企业,或从事休闲,兼职,分包,特许经营,远程工作或家庭工作的工作的人有了显着增长。这些就业状况群体现在通常被称为不稳定的工人;主要是因为他们的持续就业和收入尚不确定。现有的研究表明,不稳定的工人发生与工作有关的伤害的可能性更大。本文关注的是不稳定工作的澳大利亚工人在多大程度上正式报告其与工作有关的伤害和疾病,并要求获得工人赔偿。尽管澳大利亚拥有全面的(尽管是零散的)工人赔偿保险制度,但这种正式保险与工人的劳动倾向没有关系。赔偿索赔。本文总结了一系列来自澳大利亚不稳定工人研究的发现,并详细分析了我们有关长途卡车驾驶员的最新研究项目中有关工人赔偿要求的经验。我们认为,即使有工人补偿保险的那些不稳定工人,也不太可能比其他工人要索赔,这有两个主要原因:承保范围的不确定性和对提出索赔的后果的担心。因此,受伤的不稳定工人在受伤后更多地依靠自己的资源,将伤害治疗的费用外部化到纳税人资助的资源上,或者使伤害和疾病得不到治疗,有可能发展成慢性病。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号