...
首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine >Low sensitivity of qSOFA, SIRS criteria and sepsis definition to identify infected patients at risk of complication in the prehospital setting and at the emergency department triage
【24h】

Low sensitivity of qSOFA, SIRS criteria and sepsis definition to identify infected patients at risk of complication in the prehospital setting and at the emergency department triage

机译:qSOFA,SIRS标准和败血症定义的敏感性低,无法识别出院前环境和急诊分诊时有并发症风险的感染患者

获取原文
           

摘要

Sepsis is defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a?host response to infection. The quick SOFA (qSOFA) score has been recently proposed as a new bedside clinical score to identify patients with suspected infection at risk of complication (intensive care unit (ICU) admission, in-hospital mortality). The aim of this study was to measure the sensitivity of the qSOFA score, SIRS criteria and sepsis definitions to identify the most serious sepsis cases in the prehospital setting and at the emergency department (ED) triage. We performed a retrospective study of all patients transported by emergency medical services (EMS) to the Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) over twelve months. All patients with a suspected or proven infection after the ED workup were included. We retrospectively analysed the sensitivity of the qSOFA score (≥2 criteria), SIRS criteria (≥2 clinical criteria) and sepsis definition (SIRS criteria + one sign of organ dysfunction or hypoperfusion) in the pre-hospital setting and at the ED triage as predictors of ICU admission, ICU stay of ≥3?days and early (i.e. 48?h) mortality. No direct comparison between the three tools was attempted. Among 11,411 patients transported to the University hospital, 886 (7.8%) were included. In the pre-hospital setting, the sensitivity of qSOFA reached 36.3% for ICU admission, 17.4% for ICU stay of three days or more and 68.0% for 48?h mortality. The sensitivity of SIRS criteria reached 68.8% for ICU admission, 74.6% for ICU stay of three days or more and 64.0% for 48?h mortality. The sensitivity of sepsis definition did not reach 60% for any outcome. At ED triage, the sensitivity of qSOFA reached 31.2% for ICU admission, 30.5% for ICU stay of ≥3?days and 60.0% for mortality at 48?h. The sensitivity of SIRS criteria reached 58.8% for ICU admission, 57.6% for ICU stay of ≥3?days 80.0% for mortality at 48?h. The sensitivity of sepsis definition reached 60.0% for 48?h mortality. Incidence of sepsis in the ED among patients transported by ambulance was 3.8 percent. This rate, associated to the mortality of sepsis, confirms the necessity to dispose of a test to early identify those patients. The sensitivity performance of all three tools was suboptimal. The qSOFA score, SIRS criteria and sepsis definition have low identification sensitivity in selecting septic patients in the pre-hospital setting or upon arrival in the ED at risk of complication.
机译:败血症定义为由宿主对感染的反应引起的威胁生命的器官功能障碍。快速SOFA(qSOFA)评分是最近提出的一项新的床旁临床评分,用于识别具有并发症风险(重症监护病房(ICU)入院,住院死亡率)的可疑感染患者。这项研究的目的是测量qSOFA评分,SIRS标准和脓毒症定义的敏感性,以识别院前环境和急诊室(ED)分诊中最严重的脓毒症病例。我们对十二个月内所有通过紧急医疗服务(EMS)运送到洛桑大学医院(CHUV)的患者进行了回顾性研究。 ED检查后所有怀疑或证实感染的患者都包括在内。我们回顾性分析了在院前环境和ED分诊中qSOFA评分(≥2标准),SIRS标准(≥2临床标准)和败血症定义(SIRS标准+器官功能障碍或灌注不足的一种征兆)的敏感性。 ICU入院的预测指标,ICU停留时间≥3天和早期(即48小时)死亡率。没有尝试在这三个工具之间进行直接比较。在运送到大学医院的11,411名患者中,包括886名(7.8%)。在院前环境中,ICU入院时qSOFA的敏感性达到36.3%,ICU停留三天或更长时间达到17.4%,而48h死亡率达到68.0%。对于ICU入院,SIRS标准的敏感性达到68.8%,ICU停留三天或更长时间达到74.6%,对于48h死亡率达到64.0%。败血症定义的敏感性未达到任何结果的60%。在ED分类中,qSOFA对ICU入院的敏感性达到31.2%,对于≥3天的ICU停留的敏感性为30.5%,在48 h时的死亡率为60.0%。对于ICU入院,SIRS标准的敏感性达到58.8%,对于ICU住院时间≥3天的敏感性为57.6%,对于48小时的死亡率为80.0%。败血症定义对48?h死亡率的敏感性达到60.0%。由救护车运送的患者中急诊败血症的发生率为3.8%。与败血症的死亡率有关的这一比率证实了有必要进行测试以及早识别那些患者。所有这三个工具的灵敏度性能都不理想。 qSOFA评分,SIRS标准和败血症定义在选择住院前或在有急诊并发症风险的急诊室中选择败血症患者时,识别敏感性较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号