...
首页> 外文期刊>OTO Open >Randomized Controlled Pilot Study of Video Self-assessment for Resident Mastoidectomy Training:
【24h】

Randomized Controlled Pilot Study of Video Self-assessment for Resident Mastoidectomy Training:

机译:住院乳突切除术培训视频自我评估的随机对照试验研究:

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A prospective randomized controlled pilot study was performed to determine if video self-assessment improves competency in mastoidectomy and to assess interrater agreement between expert and resident evaluations of recorded mastoidectomy. Sixteen otolaryngology residents were recorded while performing cadaveric mastoidectomy and randomized into video self-assessment and control groups. All residents performed a second recorded mastoidectomy. Performance was evaluated by blinded experts with a validated assessment scale. Video self-assessment did not lead to greater skill improvement between the first and second mastoidectomy. Interrater agreement was fair to substantial between the expert evaluators and between resident self-evaluations by recall and video review. Agreement between experts and residents was only slight to fair; residents consistently rated their performance higher than experts (P .05). In conclusion, 1 session of video self-review did not lead to improved competence in mastoidectomy over standard practice. While experts agree on assessments, residents may overestimate their competency in performing cadaveric mastoidectomy.
机译:进行了一项前瞻性随机对照试验研究,以确定视频自我评估是否可以提高乳突切除术的能力,并评估记录的乳突切除术的专家评估与住院医师评估之间的相互同意。在进行尸体乳突切除术时记录了16名耳鼻喉科住院医师,并将其随机分为视频自我评估和对照组。所有居民均进行了第二次记录的乳突切除术。绩效由盲人专家以经过验证的评估量表进行评估。在第一次和第二次乳突切除术之间,视频自我评估并未带来更大的技能提升。通过召回和视频审查,专家评估人员之间和居民自我评估之间的评估者之间的协议是公平的。专家和居民之间的协议只是微不足道的。居民对他们的表现始终给予比专家更高的评价(P <.05)。总之,视频会议的1次自我审查并没有导致乳突切除术的能力优于标准做法。尽管专家们同意评估,但居民可能会高估执行尸体乳突切除术的能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号