...
首页> 外文期刊>Open access Journal of Clinical Trials >Acti-Tape? (elastic therapeutic tape) as compared with a knee guard in providing support to the knee joint: an open-label, randomized, crossover study
【24h】

Acti-Tape? (elastic therapeutic tape) as compared with a knee guard in providing support to the knee joint: an open-label, randomized, crossover study

机译:Acti-Tape? (弹性治疗带)与护膝相比,在为膝关节提供支撑方面:一项开放标签,随机,交叉研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Study design: Randomized, open-label, crossover, controlled study.Background: Elastic taping methods are used to provide support to the musculoskeletal system in athletes. Acti-Tape? (an elastic therapeutic tape) has been marketed for the last 2–3 years and has shown good results in providing support to the joints. This pilot study was planned to collect data on the clinical outcomes and to assess if a single tape application of Acti-Tape over the knee joint could provide benefits similar to a traditionally used knee guard.Methods: Thirteen subjects aged 30–65 years visiting an orthopedic center in Pune, India who were suffering from osteoarthritis were randomly assigned to either Acti-Tape (n=6) or a knee guard (n=7) in the first intervention period (6 days) and were crossed over to the other group in the second intervention period (6 days) after a washout of 1 day. Main outcome measures were change from day 0 to day 6 in pain visual analog score (VAS); timed up and go (TUG), medial step down (MSD), and unilateral anterior reach (UAR) tests; and subject's preference.Results: Data for all the 13 subjects were pooled and analyzed by Student's t-test as treatment-by-period interaction was not significant by analysis of variance (P>0.05). The changes (mean ± standard deviation) after using Acti-Tape and a knee guard, respectively, were pain VAS, –10±5.4 versus (vs) –11.5±5.83; TUG, –0.62±1.33 vs –0.46±1.56; UAR, 0.15±1.07 vs 0.75±0.44; and MSD, 1.08±095 vs 0.85±1.14. These were statistically significant with both devices for pain VAS, UAR, and MSD, but not for TUG. Between the treatments however, no statistically significant difference was seen. Eleven of 13 (85%) subjects preferred Acti-Tape for future use (P<0.05 by McNemar’s?χ2 test). No safety concerns were reported by the subjects.Conclusion: Single tape application of Acti-Tape over the knee joint improves clinical outcomes similar to that of the knee guard. The patients preferred Acti-Tape to knee guard for future use.
机译:研究设计:随机,开放标签,交叉,对照研究。背景:弹性编带方法用于为运动员的肌肉骨骼系统提供支持。 Acti-Tape? (一种弹性治疗带)已经上市了近2-3年,并且在为关节提供支撑方面显示出良好的效果。计划进行该初步研究,以收集有关临床结果的数据,并评估在膝盖关节上单独应用Acti-Tape胶带是否能提供类似于传统护膝的好处。方法:13名年龄在30-65岁之间的受试者就诊于在印度浦那的骨关节炎患者中,骨科中心在第一个干预期(6天)中被随机分配到Acti-Tape(n = 6)或护膝(n = 7),然后转移到另一组在冲洗1天后的第二个干预期(6天)中。主要结局指标为疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)从第0天到第6天的变化;定时走(TUG),内侧下移(MSD)和单侧前伸(UAR)测试;结果:13名受试者的数据被汇总并通过Student's t检验进行了分析,因为不同治疗之间的交互作用通过方差分析没有显着性(P> 0.05)。使用Acti-Tape和护膝后的变化(平均值±标准偏差)分别为疼痛VAS,–10±5.4与(vs)–11.5±5.83; TUG,–0.62±1.33和–0.46±1.56; UAR:0.15±1.07和0.75±0.44;和MSD,分别为1.08±095和0.85±1.14。对于疼痛VAS,UAR和MSD而言,这两种设备的统计学意义均显着,而对于TUG则无统计学意义。然而,治疗之间没有统计学上的显着差异。 13名受试者(85%)中有11名更喜欢Acti-Tape以便将来使用(McNemar的χ2检验,P <0.05)。受试者未报告安全性问题。结论:Acti-Tape在膝关节上单条胶带的应用可改善临床效果,类似于护膝。患者首选Acti-Tape代替护膝以备将来使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号