首页> 外文期刊>Open Access Library Journal >Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair: Tow Centre Experience Prospective Comparative Study
【24h】

Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair: Tow Centre Experience Prospective Comparative Study

机译:腹腔镜腹疝修补术:牵引中心经验前瞻性比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Ventral hernia is one of the most common abdominal wall hernias. Several procedures have been used for hernia repair. During the last few decades, the open surgical approach has been the standard technique for hernia repair. During the past 10 years, laparoscopic repair of ventral hernia has become increasingly established in clinical practice and aimed to be an acceptable and successful technique. There are many techniques used in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair and the most commonly used is fixation of mesh without closing the defect or closing the defect before fixation of mesh. Aim of the Study: T he aim of this study is to compare outcomes and results of closure versus non-closure of ventral hernia defect during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in tow center and report our experience in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Patients and Methods: This is comparative prospective study between laparoscopic ventral hernia repair without closure of the defect and with closure of the defect before fixation of the mesh. 60 patients were divided into 2 groups: Group 1 treated with laparoscopic ventral hernia repair without defect closure and group 2 treated with laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with hernia defect closure, and we followed up the patients in both groups for operative outcomes and post-operative complications, hospital stay, recurrences, patients’ satisfactions. Results: Operative time was longer in group 2—closure group than in group 1—non-closure group. Post operative seroma is 65% in group 1 and 16% in group 2. Recurrence occurs in one patient [3.33%] in group 2 versus 4 patients [13.33%] in group 1. Conclusion: Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is safe and feasible, although laparoscopic ventral hernia repair without closure of the defect is easy with less operative time and does not need extra-experience in intra-corporeal suturing but its benefit was in smaller defect [3 cm] and larger defect needs a laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with defect closure.
机译:背景:腹疝是最常见的腹壁疝之一。几种手术已用于疝气修复。在过去的几十年中,开放式手术已成为疝气修复的标准技术。在过去的十年中,腹腔镜修复腹疝已在临床实践中日益确立,并旨在成为一种可接受且成功的技术。腹腔镜腹疝修补术有很多技术,最常用的是固定网孔而不闭合缺损或在固定网孔之前闭合缺损。研究的目的:本研究的目的是比较牵引中心腹腔镜腹疝修补术中腹疝缺损闭合与未闭合的结局和结果,并报告我们在腹腔镜腹疝修补中的经验。患者与方法:这是一项在腹腔镜腹侧疝修补术未闭合缺损和闭合网孔之前闭合缺损之间的比较性前瞻性研究。 60例患者分为2组:第1组腹腔镜腹侧疝修补术并没有闭合缺损,第2组腹腔镜腹侧疝修补术并有疝缺损闭合治疗,我们对两组患者的手术结局和术后并发症进行了随访。 ,住院时间,复发率,患者满意度。结果:第2组(封闭组)的手术时间比第1组(非封闭组)的手术时间更长。手术后血清肿在第1组中占65%,在第2组中占16%。在第2组中,一名患者[3.33%]相对于第1组中的4例[13.33%]发生复发。结论:腹腔镜腹侧疝修补术是安全可行的,尽管无需闭合缺损的腹腔镜腹疝修补术很容易且手术时间较短,并且不需要体内缝合,但其益处在于较小的缺损[3 cm],较大的缺损需要腹腔镜腹疝修补术关闭。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号