首页> 外文期刊>Open Journal of Social Sciences >Two of a Kind or One Far Behind: Comparative Analysis of Internet Media and Traditional Media behind Public Policy Agenda
【24h】

Two of a Kind or One Far Behind: Comparative Analysis of Internet Media and Traditional Media behind Public Policy Agenda

机译:两种还是两种:公共政策议程背后的互联网媒体与传统媒体的比较分析

获取原文
           

摘要

With the rapid development of internet, the question comes up as to who plays a stronger role in the creation of the public policy agenda: Internet media or the traditional media? This study takes the case of PM 2.5 information exposure as an example to explore how internet media and traditional media work together to promote the formation of public policy. By selecting samples of internet media, traditional media and policy agenda, and by way of the empirical analysis, we came to the conclusion that Internet media and the traditional media have the same agenda setting function; these two parties have their own advantages and influence each other and promote the establishment of the policy agenda together. This study supplements the theory of agenda setting.
机译:随着互联网的飞速发展,人们提出了一个问题:谁在公共政策议程的制定中扮演更重要的角色:互联网媒体还是传统媒体?本研究以PM 2.5信息暴露为例,探讨互联网媒体与传统媒体如何共同促进公共政策的形成。通过选择互联网媒体,传统媒体和政策议程的样本,并通过实证分析,得出互联网媒体和传统媒体具有相同的议程设置功能的结论。这两方面各有优势,相互影响,共同促进政策议程的建立。这项研究是对议程设置理论的补充。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号