...
首页> 外文期刊>Open Journal of Occupational Therapy >Pinch Testing Positions Among Certified Hand Therapists: A Cross-Sectional Survey
【24h】

Pinch Testing Positions Among Certified Hand Therapists: A Cross-Sectional Survey

机译:捏手治疗师中捏测试位置的横断面调查

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Pinch strength is indicative of later functional hand use following injury to hand. However, we believe clinicians (and more specifically CHTs) currently do not use a consistent measurement of pinch grip, despite availability of a “gold standard” of current (2015) ASHT standards for measuring pinch grip. Methods: This cross-sectional survey (N = 175, 35% response) was designed to determine whether CHTs adhere to the standardized testing position for palmar pinch strength as recommended by the ASHT. Results: Results determined that only 5.7% (n = 10) of the CHTs surveyed complete the entire ASHT standardized testing position. An additional 18.3% (n = 32) of the CHTs reported positioning the upper arm, forearm, and wrist per the guidelines, but did not hold under the gauge as recommended. The low percentage of adherence to this position contrasts with the majority of the CHTs (98.3%) reporting using standardized testing position for grip strength for at least 75% of attempts. Conclusion: It is possible that the pinch guidelines are not as widespread in the literature, and therefore, clinicians are not able to reference the recommended standardized positions.
机译:背景:捏力表示手受伤后的后续功能性使用。但是,我们认为,尽管可以使用当前(2015年)ASHT标准中的“金标准”来测量捏紧力,但临床医生(更具体地说是CHT)目前并未使用一致的捏紧力测量方法。方法:本横断面调查(N = 175,应答率35%)旨在确定CHT是否符合ASHT推荐的手掌捏强度标准测试位置。结果:结果确定,只有5.7%(n = 10)的被调查CHT完成了整个ASHT标准化测试职位。根据指南,另有18.3%(n = 32)的CHT报告了上臂,前臂和手腕的位置,但没有按照建议的方法放置在压力表下。坚持该姿势的百分比较低,这与大多数CHT(98.3%)形成鲜明对比,后者报告使用标准测试姿势进行至少75%的尝试抓握强度。结论:捏捏指南可能在文献中不那么广泛,因此,临床医生无法参考推荐的标准化位置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号