首页> 外文期刊>Oeno One >SSR molecular marker analysis of the grapevine germplasm of Montenegro
【24h】

SSR molecular marker analysis of the grapevine germplasm of Montenegro

机译:黑山葡萄种质的SSR分子标记分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Aim: Given that the information about the origin, genetic relationships, and diversity of Montenegrin grapevines is still partial, we performed a detailed analysis of the germplasm in this country using simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. Our main goal was to determine the identity of cultivars unique to Montenegro and those shared with other countries, especially the neighbouring ones.Methods and results: Seventy samples were collected and 14 genotypes were found. After SSR profile comparison with available molecular databases and literature data, the identity of each genotype was established. Five well-known cultivars were found, the others being minor, lesser-known cultivars.Conclusion: This research provides an overview of the Montenegrin grapevine assortment. There are cultivars shared with other countries, mainly the neighbouring ones, while others are likely native to Montenegro. The Krato?ija population (alias Primitivo, Zinfandel and Crljenak Ka?telanski) has a large number of different names in Montenegro and also a wide morphological variability. Therefore, Montenegro is the best candidate as the origin and spreading point of this cultivar.Significance and impact of the study: The present study adds information on the identity, origin, diffusion and variability of some grapevine cultivars, allowing us to reconstruct the history and evolution of national and transnational ampelographic assortment of Montenegro. IntroductionMontenegro is a small country located in the Balkan Peninsula and overlooking the Adriatic Sea. Grapevine growing in Montenegro dates back before the Roman period (Vuksanovi?, 1977). The climatic, soil and orographic conditions of southern Montenegro define two wine regions: the Montenegro Skadar Lake basin, encompassing the Podgorica, Crmnica, Rijecki, Bjelopavlicki and Katunski sub regions, and the Montenegrin seacoast region, including the Boko-Kotorski, Budvansko-Barski, Ulcinjski and Grahovsko-Nudolski sub regions. Ancient and probably autochthonous cultivars dominate the present grapevine assortment of these two regions, and very heterogeneous populations appear as a consequence of perennial growing. Furthermore, there are numerous local grapevine cultivars lacking heterogeneity in their population, which have been registered as autochthonous even though they were not definitively identified. Most of these cultivars can be recognized using OIV codes, but it is not enough for their reliable identification (Uli?evi?, 1966; Pejovi?, 1988; Mara?, 2000).Current viticulture and wine production in Montenegro is based mainly on presumed autochthonous grapevine cultivars, such as Vranac, Krato?ija, Krsta?, and ?i?ak. The dominant cultivars for red wine production are Vranac and Krato?ija. Significantly less prevalent is Krsta?, used for white wine production, while no commercial wine is produced from ?i?ak. The presence of Mu?ka?ela and Trojka is significantly lower.The results of Calò et al. (2008) showed that Krato?ija is a synonym of the Californian Zinfandel, the Italian Primitivo and the Croatian Crljenak Ka?telanski, and suggested a first-degree relationship with the Montenegrin Vranac. Contrary to Vranac, which has stable morphological traits and has undergone expansion in the recent years, Krato?ija is very ancient and a lot of biotypes have been found within its population, not fully investigated yet. Because of its heterogeneity, Krato?ija is less present alone in the vineyards, and is found mostly in combination with Vranac, which dominates in the assortment of red grape cultivars. The heterogeneity of Krato?ija has been described by many authors (Stojanovi?, 1929; Buli?, 1949; Jelaska, 1954; Uli?evi?, 1966; Avramov, 1988; Pejovi?, 1988; Buri?, 1995; Bozinovik et al., 1998; Mara?, 2000; Mara? et al., 2004). It is well known that the features of an old grapevine cultivar may change with the accumulation and fixation of mutations in the shoot apical meristem, giving rise to many biotypes within the population, even with noticeable morphological or phenological differences. In this context, our work had different purposes. Using simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers, we wanted i) to investigate the identity of almost all grapevine cultivars grown in Montenegro; ii) to determine which cultivars are likely native to Montenegro and which are common to neighbouring countries; iii) to ascertain the identity of presumed Krato?ija biotypes collected in the experimental field of the Biotechnical Institute in Ljeskopolje and coming from different Montenegro private vineyards, where they are cultivated under many different names, depending on the area; and iv) to verify the correct identity of Vranac mother vines chosen for clonal selection process.Materials and methods1. Plant materialSeventy samples were selected for genotyping during the period from 2006 to 2010. The vines were collected from different viticultural areas of Montenegro (Table 1).Table 1. Accession list (name, pro
机译:目的:鉴于有关黑山葡萄的起源,遗传关系和多样性的信息仍不完整,我们使用简单序列重复(SSR)标记对该国的种质进行了详细分析。我们的主要目的是确定黑山和与其他国家(尤其是邻国)共有的独特品种的身份。方法和结果:收集了70个样品,发现了14个基因型。在将SSR谱图与可用的分子数据库和文献数据进行比较后,确定了每种基因型的身份。发现了五个著名的品种,其他是次要的,鲜为人知的品种。结论:本研究概述了黑山葡萄品种。与其他国家(主要是邻国)共享一些栽培品种,而其他品种则很可能是黑山当地人。 Krato?ija种群(别名Primitivo,Zinfandel和Crljenak Ka?telanski)在黑山有很多不同的名字,并且形态变异也很大。因此,黑山是该品种的起源和传播点的最佳候选者。研究的意义和影响:本研究增加了一些葡萄品种的身份,起源,扩散和变异性的信息,使我们能够重建历史和黑山的国家和跨国流水画集的演变。简介黑山共和国是一个位于巴尔干半岛的小国,俯瞰亚得里亚海。黑山的葡萄种植可以追溯到罗马时期之前(Vuksanovi?,1977年)。黑山南部的气候,土壤和地形条件定义了两个葡萄酒产区:黑山Skadar湖盆地,包括Podgorica,Crmnica,Rijecki,Bjelopavlicki和Katunski子地区,以及黑山海岸地区,包括Boko-Kotorski,Budvansko-Barski ,Ulcinjski和Grahovsko-Nudolski子区域。古老的和可能是土生土长的葡萄品种在这两个地区目前的葡萄树品种中占主导地位,并且由于多年生的生长,出现了非常不同的种群。此外,许多当地的葡萄品种在其种群中缺乏异质性,即使尚未明确鉴定,也已被注册为本地种。这些品种中的大多数都可以用OIV代码识别,但这还不足以对其进行可靠的识别(Uli?evi ?, 1966; Pejovi?,1988; Mara?,2000)。黑山目前的葡萄栽培和葡萄酒生产主要基于可能是当地的葡萄品种,例如Vranac,Krato?ija,Krsta?和?iak。红酒生产的主要品种是Vranac和Krato?ija。用于白葡萄酒生产的Krsta?的流行率要低得多,而未使用'Iak'生产的商业酒却很少。 Mu?ka?ela和Trojka的含量要低得多。 (2008年)表明Krato?ija是加利福尼亚州的Zinfandel,意大利的Primitivo和克罗地亚的Crljenak Ka?telanski的同义词,并暗示与黑山Vranac有一级关系。与具有稳定的形态特征并在最近几年中得到扩展的Vranac相反,Krato?ija非常古老,在其种群中发现了许多生物型,尚未进行充分调查。由于其异质性,Kratitoja很少单独出现在葡萄园中,并且主要与Vranac结合使用,Vranac在红葡萄品种中占主导地位。 Krato?ija的异质性已被许多作者描述(Stojanovi ?, 1929; Buli ?, 1949; Jelaska,1954; Uli?evi ?, 1966; Avramov,1988; Pejovi ?, 1988; Buri ?, 1995; Bozinovik等等人,1998; Mara?,2000; Mara?等,2004)。众所周知,一个古老的葡萄品种的特征可能会随着芽顶分生组织中突变的积累和固定而发生变化,从而在种群内产生许多生物型,即使在形态或物候方面也存在明显差异。在这种情况下,我们的工作有不同的目的。我们希望使用简单的序列重复(SSR)标记,i)研究黑山几乎所有葡萄品种的身份; ii)确定哪些品种可能起源于黑山,哪些品种为邻国所共有; iii)确定在勒斯科普里耶生物技术研究所实验场收集的假定的克拉托菲娅生物型的身份,这些生物型来自不同的黑山私人葡萄园,在那儿以不同的名字种植,取决于地区; iv)验证用于克隆选择过程的Vranac母藤的正确身份。材料和方法1。植物材料2006年至2010年期间选择了70个样品进行基因分型。葡萄藤是从黑山的不同葡萄栽培地区收集的(表1)。表1。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号