首页> 外文期刊>Oeno One >The extraction kinetics of anthocyanins and proanthocyanidins from grape to wine in three different varieties
【24h】

The extraction kinetics of anthocyanins and proanthocyanidins from grape to wine in three different varieties

机译:三种不同品种从葡萄到葡萄酒中花色苷和原花色素的提取动力学

获取原文
           

摘要

Aims: To study the influence of the grape variety (Syrah, Monastrell and Cabernet Sauvignon) on the extraction kinetics of phenolic compounds (proanthocyanidins (PAs) and anthocyanins) during a skin maceration period of 20 days.Methods and results: Anthocyanins and PAs were analyzed by HPLC in three wine varieties during maceration time (20 days). The results showed that anthocyanin extraction followed the same kinetics for the three varieties. In the case of PAs, Syrah must-wine showed the highest concentration of these compounds, which were seen to be mainly skin-derived. Monastrell must-wine presented the lowest concentration of total PAs and the lowest percentage of skin-derived PAs. Cabernet Sauvignon must-wine obtained intermediate values for total PAs, although these compounds were more polymerized.Conclusion: Grape variety and extractability play a very important role in the wine PA profile. Thus, the highest values of total PAs were observed in the wines of Cabernet Sauvignon and especially Syrah.Significant and impact of the study: Knowledge of the kinetics of each variety during the maceration step may help manage the composition of wines in light of consumer preference. IntroductionPhenolics, mainly anthocyanins and proanthocyanidins (PAs), are important compounds in red wine quality because they influence colour, mouthfeel and aging ability. Studies have shown that overall intensity and persistence are positively correlated with astringency, and therefore to PA content (Mercurio et al., 2010). An optimal extraction of phenolic compounds from the skin and seeds of grape berries is crucial to ensure colour stabilization in the resulting wines and to impart desirable mouthfeel properties. The diffusion of the different polyphenols from grape to must-wine and, consequently, their extractability and final concentration at the end of the maceration process largely depends on their location in the berry and the characteristics of the different grape varieties, especially those related to the concentration in phenolic compounds and the extractability of these polyphenols.Anthocyanins are located in the skins, in the upper cellular layers of the hypodermis, while PAs are found in both skins and seeds. Skin PAs are mainly located in the skin cell vacuoles (Amrani-Joutei et al., 1994), while seed PAs are found in the epidermis, the outer integument and the inner integument (Cadot et al., 2006). PAs with upper dihydroxylated unit are called procyanidins and are present in grape skin and seeds, and PAs with upper trihydroxylated unit are called prodelphinidins and are present only in grape skin (Prieur et al., 1994; Souquet et al., 1996). Grape skin PAs have a higher mean degree of polymerization (mDP) and a lower proportion of galloylated subunits than seed PAs.Both the quantity and the extractability of anthocyanins and tannins increase throughout the grape ripening. The tannins and anthocyanins form different complexes with the cell wall components during berry development (Geny et al., 2003). As the berry ripens these complexes are broken up more easily than in unripe berries. During the maceration step of the winemaking process, phenolic compounds are extracted from grapes into wine. Anthocyanins are mainly extracted in the first days of fermentative maceration (González-Neves et al., 2008), and most skin PAs, due to their localization, are also solubilized, together with anthocyanins. However, the extraction of seed PAs takes longer. Seed PAs are diffused more slowly and require longer maceration times, while their extraction is favoured by the presence of ethanol (Canals et al., 2005; González-Manzano et al., 2004; Del Llaudy et al., 2008). This different extraction dynamics of PAs from grape into wine is therefore an important aspect to be considered when managing the maceration time (Singleton and Draper, 1964; Boulton, 1995), although it may also be influenced by the grape variety and the technological process applied at the winery, e.g., the extent of berry crushing, pectinolytic enzyme addition, the use of dry ice or the application of low prefermentative temperature (Canals et al., 2008; Cerpa-Calderón and Kennedy, 2008; Busse-Valverde et al., 2011; Hernández-Jiménez et al., 2012; Bautista-Ortín et al., 2013).Grape variety is one of the factors that have an important influence on the phenolic (PAs and anthocyanins) concentration and composition of the wine. Gonzalez-Neves et al. (2008) studied the influence of grape variety on the extraction of anthocyanins during fermentation on skins in three varieties (Cabernet Sauvignon, Merlot and Tannat) and concluded that the anthocyanin fingerprint of the young wines obtained in classical fermentation is characteristic of each variety, although their initial evolution follows general tendencies. In the case of PAs, Busse-Valverde et al. (2010) reported differences in the PA composition of Monastrell, Syrah and Cabernet Sauvignon wines that were more re
机译:目的:研究葡萄品种(西拉(Syrah),莫纳斯特雷(Monastrell)和赤霞珠(Cabernet Sauvignon)对20天皮肤浸渍期间酚类化合物(原花青素(PAs)和花青素)提取动力学的影响。在浸没时间(20天)中,通过HPLC对三种葡萄酒进行了分析。结果表明,三个品种的花色苷提取遵循相同的动力学。就PA而言,西拉必需酒显示出这些化合物的最高浓度,而这些化合物主要来自皮肤。 Monastrell必备酒呈现出最低的总PA浓度和最低的皮肤衍生PA百分比。赤霞珠必须在葡萄酒中获得总PA的中间值,尽管这些化合物聚合度更高。结论:葡萄的品种和可萃取性在葡萄酒PA的特征中起着非常重要的作用。因此,在赤霞珠,尤其是西拉葡萄酒中观察到了最高的总PA值。研究的意义和影响:了​​解浸渍过程中每个品种的动力学可能有助于根据消费者的喜好管理葡萄酒的成分。 。简介酚类化合物,主要是花青素和原花青素(PAs),是红酒质量中的重要化合物,因为它们会影响颜色,口感和老化能力。研究表明,总体强度和持久性与涩味呈正相关,因此与PA含量呈正相关(Mercurio等,2010)。从葡萄果皮和种子中提取酚类化合物的最佳方法对于确保所得葡萄酒的颜色稳定并赋予理想的口感至关重要。不同多酚从葡萄到酒的扩散,因此,在浸软过程结束时其可萃取性和最终浓度在很大程度上取决于它们在浆果中的位置以及不同葡萄品种的特性,尤其是与葡萄品种有关的特性。花青素位于皮肤,皮下组织的上层细胞中,而PA则存在于皮肤和种子中。皮肤PAs主要位于皮肤细胞的液泡中(Amrani-Joutei等,1994),而种子PAs则存在于表皮,外被膜和内部被膜(Cadot等人,2006)。具有较高二羟基化单元的PA称为原花青素,存在于葡萄皮和种子中,具有较高三羟基化单元的PA称为原花青素,仅存在于葡萄皮中(Prieur等,1994; Souquet等,1996)。葡萄皮PA比种子PA具有更高的平均聚合度(mDP)和更少的甲酰化亚基比例。在整个葡萄成熟过程中,花色苷和单宁的数量和提取率均增加。单宁和花青素在浆果发育过程中与细胞壁成分形成不同的复合物(Geny等,2003)。随着浆果的成熟,这些复合物比未成熟的浆果更容易分解。在酿酒过程的浸渍步骤中,酚类化合物从葡萄中提取到葡萄酒中。花青素主要在发酵浸没的第一天提取(González-Neves等,2008),并且大多数皮肤PA由于其定位而与花青素一起溶解。但是,种子PA的提取需要更长的时间。种子PA的扩散较慢,需要更长的浸渍时间,而乙醇的存在有利于其提取(Canals等,2005;González-Manzano等,2004; Del Llaudy等,2008)。因此,从葡萄到葡萄酒中PA的这种不同提取动力学是管理浸渍时间的重要方面(Singleton and Draper,1964; Boulton,1995),尽管它也可能受到葡萄品种和所应用技术过程的影响。在酒厂中,例如浆果的压碎程度,添加的果胶分解酶,干冰的使用或较低的优选温度的应用(Canals等,2008;Cerpa-Calderón和Kennedy,2008; Busse-Valverde等。 ,2011;Hernández-Jiménez等,2012;Bautista-Ortín等,2013)葡萄品种是影响葡萄酒中酚类(PAs和花色苷)浓度和成分的重要因素之一。 Gonzalez-Neves等。 (2008)研究了葡萄品种对三种葡萄皮(赤霞珠,梅洛和塔纳特)的发酵过程中花色苷提取的影响,并得出结论,尽管经典发酵获得的年轻葡萄酒的花色苷指纹是每个品种的特征,尽管它们的最初发展遵循总体趋势。对于PA,Busse-Valverde等人。 (2010年)报道了Monastrell,Syrah和Cabernet Sauvignon葡萄酒的PA成分差异更大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号